ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2023
Prevalence and clinical profile of keratoconus in patients presenting at a provincial hospital in KwaZulu, Natal, South Africa: A case study.
Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proportion and clinical characteristics of keratoconus among patients attending refraction units: a retrospective facility-based study in Malawi.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Sex Hormone Imbalance in Keratoconus: Estrogen-Mediated Collagen Remodeling and Biomechanical Weakening.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Demographic and clinical presentations of keratoconus in Trinidad and Tobago: a retrospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical and demographic profile of patients with keratoconus in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2026Article
- Availability of Eye Care Services and Management Strategies for Ocular Conditions in the uMgungundlovu District, KwaZulu-Natal.Clinical optometry · 2025Article
- Review
- Clinical Profiles of Patients with Keratoconus Visiting a Tertiary Eye Center in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive, asymmetrical corneal disease, characterized by stromal thinning that leads to distortion, causing vision loss. The visual loss is secondary to corneal scarring, irregular astigmatism, and myopia. The prevalence of KC has been reported to differ in different parts of the world. The study aimed to determine the prevalence and profile of patients with KC presenting to a provincial hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. A retrospective study design was used to review 412 clinical records of patients attending the McCord Provincial Eye Hospital (MPEH) during a five-year period (2016-2020). Data on age, race, refraction, clinical profile, treatment plan, and diagnosis were ascertained. The prevalence of KC in MPEH was found to be 13.7% with a mean age of 24.7±7.94 years. Black African and females had a higher frequency of KC compared to males and other ethnic groups. Most of the patients presented with a severe stage of KC and referral was the most common management. Central corneal thinning and Munson's sign were the most prevalent clinical signs. There was no statistically significant difference between the worse and better eye when comparing the clinical signs. The prevalence and clinical profile of patients with KC in this study was similar to that reported by previous studies and more in Blacks and females. Population based epidemiological studies are needed to determine the prevalence of KC in South Africa to enable early clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.