Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37942055›Full record

ArticleBJA open2023

Effect of general anaesthesia with remimazolam versus propofol on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic meniscus repair: a randomised clinical trial.

Lili Tang, Yue Sun, Xixi Hao, Xuemei Sun, Cuiyu Xie, Tingting Wang, Chengyang Hu, Yao Lu, Xuesheng Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lili TangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Yue SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Xixi HaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Xuemei SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Cuiyu XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Tingting WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Chengyang HuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yao LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Xuesheng LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The type of anaesthesia and choice of anaesthetic drugs may affect the quality of recovery after surgery. Remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine with rapid onset and offset, specifically antagonised by flumazenil. This study aimed to compare remimazolam with propofol on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic surgery. Methods: Patients aged 18-65 yr and scheduled for ambulatory arthroscopic meniscus repair were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either continuous i.v. infusion of remimazolam or plasma target-controlled infusion of propofol. The quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale was administered on postoperative day 1 (POD1) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) scores and cardiovascular variables. Results: In total, 120 patients were randomly assigned to the remimazolam or propofol groups and 114 patients were included in the analysis. The remimazolam group had higher total QoR-15 scores on POD1 (125 [120-127.5] Conclusions: Remimazolam-based total i.v. anaesthesia was associated with small improvements in the quality of recovery; however, the improvement was less than the minimally clinically important difference. Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR2100053014.

Indexed as

ambulatoryarthroscopicQoR-15quality of recoveryremimazolam

Identifiers

PMID37942055
PMCPMC10630608
OpenAlexW4388181942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.