Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941964›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Water Resources Association2023

Random Forest models to estimate bankfull and low flow channel widths and depths across the conterminous United States.

Jessie M Doyle, Ryan A Hill, Scott G Leibowitz, Joseph L Ebersole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessie M DoyleOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education c/o Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division (Doyle), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon USA; Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division (Hill, Leibowitz, Ebersole), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Ryan A HillOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education c/o Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division (Doyle), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon USA; Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division (Hill, Leibowitz, Ebersole), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Scott G LeibowitzOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education c/o Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division (Doyle), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon USA; Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division (Hill, Leibowitz, Ebersole), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Joseph L EbersoleOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education c/o Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division (Doyle), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon USA; Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division (Hill, Leibowitz, Ebersole), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Channel dimensions (width and depth) at varying flows influence a host of instream ecological processes, as well as habitat and biotic features; they are a major consideration in stream habitat restoration and instream flow assessments. Models of widths and depths are often used to assess climate change vulnerability, develop endangered species recovery plans, and model water quality. However, development and application of such models require specific skillsets and resources. To facilitate acquisition of such estimates, we created a dataset of modeled channel dimensions for perennial stream segments across the conterminous U.S. We used random forest models to predict wetted width, thalweg depth, bankfull width, and bankfull depth from several thousand field measurements of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment. Observed channel widths varied from <5 m to >2000 m and depths varied from <2 m to >125 m. Metrics of watershed area, runoff, slope, land use, and more were used as model predictors. The models had high pseudo R-squared values (0.70 to 0.91) and median absolute errors within ±6% to ±21% of the interquartile range of measured values across ten stream orders. Predicted channel dimensions can be joined to 1.1 million stream segments of the 1:100K resolution National Hydrography Dataset Plus (version 2.1). These predictions, combined with a rapidly growing body of nationally available data, will further enhance our ability to study and protect aquatic resources.

Indexed as

Bankfull DepthBankfull WidthChannel DimensionsNational Rivers and Streams AssessmentRandom ForestStreamCatThalweg DepthWetted Width

Identifiers

PMID37941964
PMCPMC10631553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.