Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941912›Full record

SynthesisCurrent opinion in psychology2022

Revealing the self in a digital world: a systematic review of adolescent online and offline self-disclosure.

Emily Towner, Jennifer Grint, Tally Levy, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, Livia Tomova

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current opinion in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring interviews with adolescent victims of human trafficking: interviewer questions and adolescent reluctance.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily TownerDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Jennifer GrintDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Tally LevyDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Sarah-Jayne BlakemoreDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Livia TomovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 104908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is an important stage of social development. While adolescents are prominent adopters of social media, little is known about whether digital interactions can fulfil the social needs of this age group. Here, we focus on one component of social interaction: self-disclosure. In a systematic review, we investigate the role of self-disclosure in adolescent relationships and the differences between online and offline self-disclosure. The results suggest that self-disclosure is associated with higher relationship quality and well-being. Online self-disclosure appears to be less fulfilling and beneficial for relationship quality than face-to-face self-disclosure. However, certain populations appear to benefit more from online than offline self-disclosure - such as highly anxious adolescents and boys aged 12-13 years, who prefer to first self-disclose online before engaging in offline self-disclosure. This suggests that both online and offline self-disclosure can play a role in fulfilling adolescent social needs.

Indexed as

DisclosureInterpersonal RelationsAdolescentHumansMaleSelf Disclosureadolescencedigital communicationself-disclosuresocial needssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37941912
PMCPMC7615289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.