Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941883›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2023

Shiva Yavarian, Parvaneh Jafari, Neda Akbari

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shiva YavarianDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.
Parvaneh JafariDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.
Neda AkbariDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.
Islamic Azad University, Arak · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) may reduce the negative effects of salinity stress. The aim of this study was to optimize Materials and Methods: The Central composite design (CCD) of response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize Results: After optimization, the amount of cell biomass by the model was 9.45 log10 CFUs/mL, which showed a 1.2-fold increase compared to the non-optimized medium. Usage of bacteria under the optimal conditions of the culture medium may increase the stability of the membrane and improve the relative water content. Bacteria were able to prevent the excessive increase of anthocyanins. Oxidative stress led to an increase in the content of chlorophyll a, while causing the degradation of chlorophyll b. Bacterial inoculation led to an increase in the level of sugar and starch compared to the control. PGPB showed an increasing effect on the amount of superoxide anion production and caused a significant increase in the antioxidant activity under salinity stress conditions. Conclusion: The PGPB can be a promising way to boost physiological characteristics of tomato plant under salinity stress. Also, sporulation capacity of

Indexed as

Bacillus megateriumLycopersicon esculentumPlant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPBs)Salinity stress

Identifiers

PMID37941883
PMCPMC10628074
OpenAlexW4387654800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.