ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2023
Evaluation of an Acne Severity Grading Self-Assessment System Suitable for the Thai Population - A Pilot Study.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Acne and Its Impact on Quality of Life, Social Appearance Anxiety and Treatment Practices Among Young Adults.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- Skin Barrier Parameters in Acne Vulgaris versus Normal Controls: A Cross-Sectional Analytic Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient self-assessment is a potential tool in clinical practice to obtain subjective information of acne severity also in clinical trials to assess the general population in research and epidemiologic studies. The patient self-evaluation of acne severity has not yet been developed in Thailand. Objective: We aimed to validate an acne severity grading self-assessment suitable for the Thai population. Methods: A pilot study was conducted in 77 volunteers with acne lesions. We developed the Thai Global Evaluation Acne Scale (TGEA) and Thai Global Acne Grading System (TGAGS) by translating and adapting the original version. Patient self-assessment of acne severity was performed in two rounds. A training session about acne was provided to all participants lesions before starting the second round. Reliability between the self-assessment and clinician assessment of acne severity was statistically assessed. Results: For TGEA, 48.05% participants rated their acne severity corresponded with the clinicians (Cohen's kappa coefficient, kappa = 0.26). After receiving the training, 79.22% subjects responded their acne severity corresponded with the clinicians (kappa = 0.66). For TGAGS, 77.92% patients who answered their acne severity corresponded with the clinicians (kappa = 0.52). After receiving the training, 94.80% participants responded their acne severity corresponded with the clinicians (kappa = 0.89). For raw score of the TGAGS, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) during the self-assessment of acne severity compared to the clinician assessments was 0.54 and it increased to 0.79 after the training. Conclusion: Due to the almost perfect reliability, we suggested that TGAGS is a reliable subjective self-assessment of acne severity suitable for the Thai population. The training is essential in enhancing the reliability of this instrument. Our study's findings can facilitate clinical practice and research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.