Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941827›Full record

ReviewInnovation in aging2023

Understanding Boredom and Leisure in Later Life: A Systematic Review.

Jaesung An, Laura L Payne, Milae Lee, Megan C Janke

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovation in aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Daily Activities and Purpose in Life.International journal of wellbeing · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Leisure activity and daily mood across adulthood: results from the Korean Time Use Survey.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Emotion Dynamics in Young and Cognitively Diverse Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaesung AnDepartment of Hospitality, Recreation and Tourism, California State University East Bay, Hayward, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8736-2140
Laura L PayneDepartment of Recreation, Sport and Tourism, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Milae LeeDepartment of Recreation, Sport and Tourism, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Megan C JankeDepartment of Kinesiology, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USBerry College · USCalifornia State University, East Bay · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Anecdotal evidence and references to boredom appear frequently in mass media, but only a few studies directly examine the phenomenon of boredom, and existing literature within the context of leisure has primarily focused on adolescents. Social isolation and loneliness often intertwine with boredom, and chronic conditions are major factors that increase the risk of experiencing boredom in later life. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to examine the significance of boredom among older adults and assess the existing literature to gain a more holistic understanding of boredom and how it has been studied among older adults in the context of leisure. Research Design and Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study gathered literature from 5 electronic databases through December 2022. This systematic review investigated both qualitative and quantitative evidence, and standardized data extraction and study quality assessments were conducted. Results: A comprehensive search initially revealed 2,757 potentially relevant articles, 8 of which met the full inclusion criteria. Three studies investigated the phenomenon of leisure-boredom, and 5 studies assessed the experience of boredom in general and its relationship with leisure engagement. A majority of the studies, especially ones that examined older adults' experience of overall boredom experience, lacked a thorough description of the phenomenon and did not use reliable and/or valid measurements. Discussion and Implications: Findings from 8 articles offer insights into boredom; however, the discussion examines the limitations of these studies and reasons why studying boredom is important. We also speculate as to why little research has addressed leisure boredom among older adults and propose a research agenda for increasing our understanding of the ways older adults experience boredom, the effects boredom has on health and well-being, and how boredom can be alleviated and/or managed in the context of leisure.

Indexed as

BoredomHealthy agingLeisureOlder adultsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37941827
PMCPMC10630011
OpenAlexW4387012003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.