ArticleAtmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994)2022
Cloud and fog deposition: Monitoring in high elevation and coastal ecosystems. The past, present, and future.
Article in Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collection methods critical load values and total nitrogen budgets for high-elevation and fog-impacted sites requires reliable cloud and fog water deposition estimates. The cost and labor intensity of cloud/fog water sample collection have made it difficult to conduct long-term studies that would provide the data needed to develop accurate estimates. Current understanding of fog formation, transport, and the role of fog and cloud deposition in hydrogeological and biogeochemical cycles is incomplete due, in part, to lack of a concerted interdisciplinary approach to the problem. Historically, these obstacles have limited interest in and collection of cloud and fog water samples. In addition to measurements of cloud/fog chemical composition, documenting fog/cloud deposition fluxes of pollutant and nutrient species requires knowledge of cloud/fog physical properties, frequency and duration of fog/cloud interception with landscapes, properties of vegetation on those landscapes, and properties of the wind that drive droplet/vegetation interactions. Because drop deposition efficiency is dependent on drop size, it is also important to consider variations in fog/cloud drop composition with drop size as species enriched in larger/ smaller drops will experience enhanced/reduced deposition rates. This paper presents summary results from a small U.S. cloud water monitoring network that operated from the mid-nineties through 2011, as well as a brief qualitative review of other cloud and fog water studies conducted in the United States (including Puerto Rico), Europe, South America/Pacific, and Asia. Current collection methods are also reviewed. Recent scientific efforts by the National Atmospheric Deposition Program's (NADP) Total Deposition Science Committee and NADP's Critical Loads of Atmospheric Deposition Science Committee have identified occult (cloud/fog) deposition as a "need" in developing critical loads for ecosystems that experience.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.