Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941695›Full record

ArticleJMA journal2023

Telemedicine for Pregnant Women on a Japanese Remote Island: A Two-year Report.

Yuta Ishikawa, Kentaro Nakanishi, Akio Masuda, Misa Hayasaka, Ai Tsumura, Koji Murakami, Takeshi Umazume, Tetsuzou Masuda, Kunihiko Nishiwaki, Yasuhito Kato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMA journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuta IshikawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakkanai City Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kentaro NakanishiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asahikawa Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Akio MasudaRebun Town National Health Insurance Funadomari Clinic, Hokkaido, Japan.
Misa HayasakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakkanai City Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ai TsumuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakkanai City Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Koji MurakamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakkanai City Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takeshi UmazumeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tetsuzou MasudaRebun Town National Health Insurance Funadomari Clinic, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kunihiko NishiwakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakkanai City Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yasuhito KatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asahikawa Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Remote antenatal checkups were conducted on the northernmost island of Japan to reduce the burden of hospital visits among pregnant women. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of remote antenatal checkups for pregnant women living on a remote island. Methods: This observational study included singleton pregnancies on Rebun Island between October 2020 and September 2022. General surgeons conducted medical interviews and performed fetal sonography using an obstetrician videoconference system at the main central hospital. The primary outcomes were the degrees of physical, mental, and economic burdens of hospital visits and the levels of anxiety and satisfaction with remote antenatal checkups as assessed using a questionnaire survey. Moreover, we investigated the incidence of adverse perinatal events, including maternal death, fetal death, neonatal death, severe neonatal neurological disorders, and other obstetric complications. Results: This study included 16 out of 22 pregnant women from Rebun Island who visited the central hospital. No adverse perinatal events occurred as a result of the remote antenatal checkups. One pregnant woman had gestational diabetes, whereas the others had no obstetric complications. The participants underwent a median of two remote antenatal checkups. According to a questionnaire survey, 90.0%, 80.0%, and 70.0% of the pregnant women perceived improvements in their physical, mental, and economic burdens, respectively. Although 70.0% of the participants experienced anxiety regarding remote antenatal checkups before the introduction, all were satisfied after delivery. Conclusions: Remote antenatal checkups effectively reduced the burden of hospital visits for pregnant women, who reported high levels of satisfaction. Furthermore, antenatal checkups were safely conducted on remote islands.

Indexed as

antenatal carematernal health servicepregnancytelemedicineultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37941695
PMCPMC10627877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.