ArticleJMA journal2023
Real-world Practical Experience of Angiotensin Receptor-neprilysin Inhibitor in Older Japanese Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
Article in JMA journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping the scientific research on geriatric nutritional assessment (2016-2025): A bibliometric analysis.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Association between serum potassium and 28-day mortality in elderly patients with sepsis: a multicenter cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), is superior to enalapril for chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, its efficacy and safety in older Japanese patients in clinical practice are poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ARNI compared with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in older patients with CHF in real-world clinical practice. In addition, nutritional status and body composition were investigated as essential indicators of efficacy. Methods: This retrospective single-center observational study enrolled 55 consecutive older patients (aged ≥75 years) with CHF who received ARNI (n = 27) or ARB (n = 28) therapy between October 2020 and March 2021. Blood samples were collected before (baseline) and 4, 12, and 24 weeks after ARNI or ARB therapy initiation. Furthermore, echocardiography was performed before (baseline) and 24 weeks after ARNI or ARB therapy initiation. The efficacy endpoints were changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, left ventricular EF, nutritional status, and body composition changes. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and geriatric nutritional risk index were investigated as nutritional status indices. The safety endpoints were symptomatic hypotension, renal function exacerbation, and hyperkalemia in patients who continued ARNI or ARB therapy for >24 weeks without additional nonpharmacological treatment. Results: There were no significant changes in NT-proBNP levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates; however, there was a significant CONUT score improvement in the ARNI group (least-squares mean difference, -1.0; 95% confidence interval, -1.4 to -0.3; Conclusions: ARNI exhibited significant improvement in the nutritional status in older patients with CHF compared with ARB. However, the ARNI dose should be adjusted according to the patient's blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.