ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
An iterative noisy annotation correction model for robust plant disease detection.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive plant health monitoring: expert-level assessment with spatio-temporal image data.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The impact of fine-tuning paradigms on unknown plant diseases recognition.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Plant disease recognition datasets in the age of deep learning: challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous work on plant disease detection demonstrated that object detectors generally suffer from degraded training data, and annotations with noise may cause the training task to fail. Well-annotated datasets are therefore crucial to build a robust detector. However, a good label set generally requires much expert knowledge and meticulous work, which is expensive and time-consuming. This paper aims to learn robust feature representations with inaccurate bounding boxes, thereby reducing the model requirements for annotation quality. Specifically, we analyze the distribution of noisy annotations in the real world. A teacher-student learning paradigm is proposed to correct inaccurate bounding boxes. The teacher model is used to rectify the degraded bounding boxes, and the student model extracts more robust feature representations from the corrected bounding boxes. Furthermore, the method can be easily generalized to semi-supervised learning paradigms and auto-labeling techniques. Experimental results show that applying our method to the Faster-RCNN detector achieves a 26% performance improvement on the noisy dataset. Besides, our method achieves approximately 75% of the performance of a fully supervised object detector when 1% of the labels are available. Overall, this work provides a robust solution to real-world location noise. It alleviates the challenges posed by noisy data to precision agriculture, optimizes data labeling technology, and encourages practitioners to further investigate plant disease detection and intelligent agriculture at a lower cost. The code will be released at https://github.com/JiuqingDong/TS_OAMIL-for-Plant-disease-detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.