ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2024
Mechanistic toxicology in light of genetic compensation.
Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Using fish models to understand the role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-interacting protein (AIP) in controlling sensitivity and resistance to dioxin-like compounds in vivo.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanistic toxicology seeks to identify the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which toxicants exert their deleterious effects. One powerful approach is to generate mutations in genes that respond to a particular toxicant, and then test how such mutations change the effects of the toxicant. CRISPR is a rapid and versatile approach to generate mutations in cultured cells and in animal models. Many studies use CRISPR to generate short insertions or deletions in a target gene and then assume that the resulting mutation, such as a premature termination codon, causes a loss of functional protein. However, recent studies demonstrate that this assumption is flawed. Cells can compensate for short insertion and deletion mutations, leading toxicologists to draw erroneous conclusions from mutant studies. In this review, we will discuss mechanisms by which a mutation in one gene may be rescued by compensatory activity. We will discuss how CRISPR insertion and deletion mutations are susceptible to compensation by transcriptional adaptation, alternative splicing, and rescue by maternally derived gene products. We will review evidence that measuring levels of messenger RNA transcribed from a mutated gene is an unreliable indicator of the severity of the mutation. Finally, we provide guidelines for using CRISPR to generate mutations that avoid compensation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.