Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941395›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

Ontology-driven analysis of marine metagenomics: what more can we learn from our data?

Kai Blumberg, Matthew Miller, Alise Ponsero, Bonnie Hurwitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kai BlumbergDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3410-4655
Matthew MillerBIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3491-8763
Alise PonseroDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4125-7561
Bonnie HurwitzDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8699-957X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proliferation of metagenomic sequencing technologies has enabled novel insights into the functional genomic potentials and taxonomic structure of microbial communities. However, cyberinfrastructure efforts to manage and enable the reproducible analysis of sequence data have not kept pace. Thus, there is increasing recognition of the need to make metagenomic data discoverable within machine-searchable frameworks compliant with the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) principles for data stewardship. Although a variety of metagenomic web services exist, none currently leverage the hierarchically structured terminology encoded within common life science ontologies to programmatically discover data.

resultsHere, we integrate large-scale marine metagenomic datasets with community-driven life science ontologies into a novel FAIR web service. This approach enables the retrieval of data discovered by intersecting the knowledge represented within ontologies against the functional genomic potential and taxonomic structure computed from marine sequencing data. Our findings highlight various microbial functional and taxonomic patterns relevant to the ecology of prokaryotes in various aquatic environments.

conclusionsIn this work, we present and evaluate a novel Semantic Web architecture that can be used to ask novel biological questions of existing marine metagenomic datasets. Finally, the FAIR ontology searchable data products provided by our API can be leveraged by future research efforts.

Indexed as

EcologyMicrobiotaMetagenomeMetagenomicsFAIR datametagenomicsmicrobial ecologyontologyRDF

Identifiers

PMID37941395
PMCPMC10632069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.