Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941354›Full record

ArticleThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry2024

On- and off-label utilisation of antipsychotics in Australia (2000-2021): Retrospective analysis of two medication datasets.

Ramya Padmavathy Radha Krishnan, Christopher Harrison, Nicholas Buckley, Jacques Eugene Raubenheimer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramya Padmavathy Radha KrishnanBiomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3495-5919
Christopher HarrisonMenzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicholas BuckleyBiomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jacques Eugene RaubenheimerBiomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine antipsychotic utilisation patterns in Australian adults from 2005 to 2021, with a focus on on-label and off-label prescriptions.

methodsWe examined antipsychotic dispensing trends in adults from 2005 to 2021 using a 10% sample of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset, which contains patient-level information on medicines dispensed throughout Australia. The lack of diagnostic information in PBS was substituted by analysing BEACH (Bettering the Evaluation And Care of Health) dataset, a cross-sectional national survey from 2000 to 2016, consisting of data from general practitioner-patient encounters.

resultsThere were 5.6 million dispensings for 164,993 patients in PBS throughout this period; 69% patients had >1 dispensing, with a median of 6 per patient. Calculating the estimated period of exposure gave a total of 693,562 treatment episodes, with a median duration of 80 days. There were steady increases in both the incidence and prevalence of antipsychotic dispensings, mainly due to oral second-generation antipsychotics. The most commonly prescribed antipsychotics were quetiapine, olanzapine and risperidone, with a significant portion of patients receiving low-dose quetiapine without dose titration. Analysis of diagnostic indications from BEACH indicated that 27% of antipsychotic prescriptions were off-label for indications such as depression, dementia, anxiety and insomnia, at much lower prescribed daily dosages.

conclusionThe increasing prescribing and off-label use highlights concerns about chronic adverse effects caused by antipsychotics. The combined analysis of medication dispensings and the diagnostic indications for which they are prescribed is a novel approach and throws a spotlight on the need for additional monitoring of antipsychotics.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOff-Label UseQuetiapine FumarateRetrospective StudiesAntipsychotic AgentsQuetiapine FumarateAntipsychoticclozapineoff-label prescribingquetiapineutilisation trends

Identifiers

PMID37941354
PMCPMC10960313
OpenAlexW4388534103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.