Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941344›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Strategic Pauses Relieve Listeners from the Effort of Listening to Fast Speech: Data Limited and Resource Limited Processes in Narrative Recall by Adult Users of Cochlear Implants.

Ryan M O'Leary, Jonathan Neukam, Thomas A Hansen, Alexander J Kinney, Nicole Capach, Mario A Svirsky, Arthur Wingfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Executive Function Associations With Audibility-Adjusted Speech Perception in Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan M O'LearyDepartment of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1042-0466
Jonathan NeukamDepartment of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9629-727X
Thomas A HansenDepartment of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7950-8039
Alexander J KinneyDepartment of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2446-3133
Nicole CapachDepartment of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7604-8375
Mario A SvirskyDepartment of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9238-0682
Arthur WingfieldDepartment of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3887-3483

Funding

Cochlear implants and listening effort: the interaction of cognitive and sensory constraintsR01DC016834 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Jonathan E Peelle, Mario A Svirsky · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech that has been artificially accelerated through time compression produces a notable deficit in recall of the speech content. This is especially so for adults with cochlear implants (CI). At the perceptual level, this deficit may be due to the sharply degraded CI signal, combined with the reduced richness of compressed speech. At the cognitive level, the rapidity of time-compressed speech can deprive the listener of the ordinarily available processing time present when speech is delivered at a normal speech rate. Two experiments are reported. Experiment 1 was conducted with 27 normal-hearing young adults as a proof-of-concept demonstration that restoring lost processing time by inserting silent pauses at linguistically salient points within a time-compressed narrative ("time-restoration") returns recall accuracy to a level approximating that for a normal speech rate. Noise vocoder conditions with 10 and 6 channels reduced the effectiveness of time-restoration. Pupil dilation indicated that additional effort was expended by participants while attempting to process the time-compressed narratives, with the effortful demand on resources reduced with time restoration. In Experiment 2, 15 adult CI users tested with the same (unvocoded) materials showed a similar pattern of behavioral and pupillary responses, but with the notable exception that meaningful recovery of recall accuracy with time-restoration was limited to a subgroup of CI users identified by better working memory spans, and better word and sentence recognition scores. Results are discussed in terms of sensory-cognitive interactions in data-limited and resource-limited processes among adult users of cochlear implants.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionHumansNoiseSpeechYoung Adultcochlear implantsnarrative recallpupillometryspeech vocodingtime-compressed speech

Identifiers

PMID37941344
PMCPMC10637151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.