ArticleIEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]2023
An Exploratory Multi-Session Study of Learning High-Dimensional Body-Machine Interfacing for Assistive Robot Control.
Article in IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Learning to Control Complex Robots Using High-Dimensional Body-Machine Interfaces.ACM transactions on human-robot interaction · 2024Article
- An Evolution of Assistive Robot Control to Meet End-User Ability.Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2024 : Boulder, Colo.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals who suffer from severe paralysis often lose the capacity to perform fundamental body movements and everyday activities. Empowering these individuals with the ability to operate robotic arms, in high degrees-of-freedom (DoFs), can help to maximize both functional utility and independence. However, robot teleoperation in high DoFs currently lacks accessibility due to the challenge in capturing high-dimensional control signals from the human, especially in the face of motor impairments. Body-machine interfacing is a viable option that offers the necessary high-dimensional motion capture, and it moreover is noninvasive, affordable, and promotes movement and motor recovery. Nevertheless, to what extent body-machine interfacing is able to scale to high-DoF robot control, and whether it is feasible for humans to learn, remains an open question. In this exploratory multi-session study, we demonstrate the feasibility of human learning to operate a body-machine interface to control a complex, assistive robotic arm. We use a sensor net of four inertial measurement unit sensors, bilaterally placed on the scapulae and humeri. Ten uninjured participants are familiarized, trained, and evaluated in reaching and Activities of Daily Living tasks, using the body- machine interface. Our results suggest the manner of control space mapping (joint-space control versus task-space control), from interface to robot, plays a critical role in the evolution of human learning. Though joint-space control shows to be more intuitive initially, task-space control is found to have a greater capacity for longer-term improvement and learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.