Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941087›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

A health-social service partnership programme for improving the health self-management of community-dwelling older adults: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study protocol.

Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, Frances Kam Yuet Wong, Karen Kit Sum Chow, Dilys Kwai Sin Kwan, Dubby Yun Sang Lau, Avis Cheuk Ki Lau

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04442867 (A Health-social Partnership Programme for Improving Health Self-management of Community-dwelling Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04442867 nacompletednot on this map

A Health-social Partnership Programme for Improving Health Self-management of Community-dwelling Older Adults: a Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled92ConditionsHealthy AgingArmsCase management, Social call
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arkers Kwan Ching WongSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 1 Cheong Wan Road, Hung Hom, Hong Kong. arkers.wong@polyu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-3099
Frances Kam Yuet WongSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 1 Cheong Wan Road, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Karen Kit Sum ChowThe Hong Kong Lutheran Social Service, Homantin, Hong Kong.
Dilys Kwai Sin KwanThe Hong Kong Lutheran Social Service, Homantin, Hong Kong.
Dubby Yun Sang LauThe Hong Kong Lutheran Social Service, Homantin, Hong Kong.
Avis Cheuk Ki LauSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 1 Cheong Wan Road, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKThe Hong Kong Council of Social Service · CN

Funding

Departmental General Research Fund UAK0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ageing population requires seamless, integrated health and social care services in the community to promote the health of older adults. However, inadequate financial resources, a lack of clear operational guidelines, and various organisational work cultures may affect the implementation quality and sustainability of these services. As a unique approach, this study seeks to examine the preliminary effects of a health-social partnership programme on the health self-management of community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong. Additionally, the study seeks to ascertain key insights into the mechanisms and processes required to implement and sustain a self-care management programme in broader practice in community settings.

methodsThis study will use a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. During the 3-month programme, subjects in the intervention group will receive four Zoom video conference sessions and four telephone calls conducted by a health-social service team that will include a nurse case manager, community workers, general practitioners, a Chinese medicine practitioner, and social workers. Subjects in the control group will receive a monthly social telephone call from a trained research assistant to rule out the possible social effect of the intervention. The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework (i.e. RE-AIM framework) will be used to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness outcomes. Of the five dimensions included in the RE-AIM framework, only effectiveness and maintenance outcomes will be collected from both the intervention and control groups. The outcomes of the other three dimensions-reach, adoption, and implementation-will only be collected from subjects in the intervention group. Data will be collected pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 3 months after the intervention is completed to evaluate the maintenance effect of the programme. DISCUSSION: This programme will aim to enhance health-promoting self-care management behaviours in older adults dwelling in the community. This will be the first study in Hong Kong to use the hybrid effectiveness-implementation design and involve key stakeholders in the evaluation and implementation of a health self-management programme using a health-social service partnership approach. The programme, which will be rooted in the community, may be used as a model, if proven successful, for similar types of services.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT04442867. Submitted 19 June 2020.

Indexed as

AgeingHealth-social service partnershipHybrid effectiveness-implementationImplementation scienceSelf-care

Identifiers

PMID37941087
PMCPMC10631147
OpenAlexW4388494624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.