ArticleBMC research notes2023
Pilot study: is there an influence of lower limb positioning during magnetic resonance imaging on muscle cross section shape assessment in the thigh?
Article in BMC research notes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Postural Conditions During Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Thigh Muscle Size.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2024Article
- First Insights in the Relationship between Lower Limb Anatomy and Back Squat Performance in Resistance-Trained Males and Females.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positioning in an MRI can influence quantitative measures of the muscle. The goal of this pilot study was to assess the influence of different levels of knee elevation during MRI on the predicted cross-sectional muscle shape in the thigh. Data were acquired in three healthy male participants (age: 29.3 ± 5.1y, height: 181.3 ± 6.4cm, weight: 85.1 ± 3.7kg). For each participant, three MRI scans were taken by a trained radiographer with low, moderate and high knee elevation. The shape of the anatomical cross-sectional areas of the hamstrings and quadriceps in three leg positionings were compared by fitting ellipsoidal functions to the segmented MRI data and calculating the so-called J index for every image slice using the Python scripting language. Different levels of knee elevation resulted in apparent changes in J index for all muscles except vastus medialis. Thereby, the changes were overall more pronounced in the hamstrings compared to the quadriceps. Particularly, by elevating the knee from 8 to 15 degree, the percentage changes in J index were between 7.2 and 13.6% for the hamstrings and between 0.5 and 3.3% for the quadriceps, respectively. For assessing the musculoskeletal properties by means of MRI, a standardized positioning of the leg is required and the knee joint angle should be controlled.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.