Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941029›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2023

Estimating genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity with methylation patterns.

Pei-Yu Lin, Ya-Ting Chang, Yu-Chun Huang, Pao-Yang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An expanded view of cell competition.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pei-Yu Lin *Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Ya-Ting Chang *Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Yu-Chun HuangInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Pao-Yang ChenInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan. paoyang@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica · TWNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a heterogeneous population of cells, individual cells can behave differently and respond variably to the environment. This cellular diversity can be assessed by measuring DNA methylation patterns. The loci with variable methylation patterns are informative of cellular heterogeneity and may serve as biomarkers of diseases and developmental progression. Cell-to-cell methylation heterogeneity can be evaluated through single-cell methylomes or computational techniques for pooled cells. However, the feasibility and performance of these approaches to precisely estimate methylation heterogeneity require further assessment.

resultsHere, we proposed model-based methods adopted from a mathematical framework originally from biodiversity, to estimate genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity. We evaluated the performance of our models and the existing methods with feature comparison, and tested on both synthetic datasets and real data. Overall, our methods have demonstrated advantages over others because of their better correlation with the actual heterogeneity. We also demonstrated that methylation heterogeneity offers an additional layer of biological information distinct from the conventional methylation level. In the case studies, we showed that distinct profiles of methylation heterogeneity in CG and non-CG methylation can predict the regulatory roles between genomic elements in Arabidopsis. This opens up a new direction for plant epigenomics. Finally, we demonstrated that our score might be able to identify loci in human cancer samples as putative biomarkers for early cancer detection.

conclusionsWe adopted the mathematical framework from biodiversity into three model-based methods for analyzing genome-wide DNA methylation heterogeneity to monitor cellular heterogeneity. Our methods, namely MeH, have been implemented, evaluated with existing methods, and are open to the research community.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationNeoplasmsBiomarkersDNAGenomeHumansSequence Analysis, DNABiomarkersDNABisulfite sequencingDNA Methylation patternEnzymatic methyl sequencingEpigeneticsMathematical modellingMethylation heterogeneity, DNA methylationNext Generation Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37941029
PMCPMC10634068
OpenAlexW4388516328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.