Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940984›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2023

Decision regret among couples experiencing infertility: a mixed methods longitudinal cohort study.

Rachel Cusatis, Colin Johnson, Katherine D Schoyer, Shirng-Wern Tsaih, Joanna Balza, Jay Sandlow, Kathryn E Flynn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Postpartum Sterilization after a Preterm Delivery Is Not Associated with Decision Regret.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel CusatisDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI, USA. rcusatis@mcw.edu.
Colin JohnsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Katherine D SchoyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Shirng-Wern TsaihDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Joanna BalzaInstitute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Jay SandlowDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Kathryn E FlynnDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY--MULTIDISCIPLINARYT32HD007133 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ROSELLI, CHARLES E. · 1985 to 2014
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecisions for how to resolve infertility are complex and may lead to regret. We examined whether couples and individuals who sought a consultation from a reproductive specialist for infertility later expressed decisional regret about their family-building choices and whether regret was associated with parental role, family-building paths, or outcomes.

methodsThis longitudinal mixed methods study included women and their partners who completed a questionnaire prior to their initial consultation with a reproductive specialist and 6 years later. The six-year questionnaire included the Ottawa Decision Regret Scale referencing "the decisions you made about how to add a child to your family." A score of 25+ indicates moderate-to-severe regret. Additional items invited reflections on family-building decisions, treatments, and costs. A systematic content analysis assessed qualitative themes.

resultsForty-five couples and 34 individuals participated in the six-year questionnaire (76% retention rate), Half (n = 61) of participants expressed no regret, which was similar by role (median 0 for women and supporting partners, F = .08; p = .77). One in 5 women and 1 in 7 partners expressed moderate-to-severe regret. Women who did not pursue any treatment had significantly higher regret (median 15; F = 5.6, p < 0.01) compared to those who pursued IVF (median 0) or other treatments (median 0). Women who did not add a child to their family had significantly higher regret (median 35; F = 10.1, p < 0.001) than those who added a child through treatment (median 0), through fostering/adoption (median 0), or naturally (median 5). Among partners, regret scores were not associated with family-building paths or outcomes. More than one-quarter of participants wished they had spent less money trying to add a child to their family. Qualitative themes included gratitude for parenthood despite the burdensome process of family-building as well as dissatisfaction or regret about the process. Results should be confirmed in other settings to increase generalizability.

conclusionThis longitudinal study provides new insight into the burden of infertility. For women seeking parenthood, any of the multiple paths to parenthood may prevent future decision regret. Greater psychosocial, financial, and decision support is needed to help patients and their partners navigate family-building with minimal regret.

Indexed as

InfertilityDecision MakingEmotionsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesDecisional regret scaleDecision-makingDecision regretFertility treatmentInfertilityMixed methods

Identifiers

PMID37940984
PMCPMC10633954
OpenAlexW4388509275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.