Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940967›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Effect of non-human hosts on the human biting rate of primary and secondary malaria vectors in Tanzania.

Godfrey C Katusi, Marie R G Hermy, Samwely M Makayula, Rickard Ignell, Ladslaus L Mnyone, Sharon R Hill, Nicodem J Govella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Impact of environmental factors on the bionomics ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Godfrey C KatusiDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Off Mlabani Passage, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Marie R G HermyDisease Vector Group, Unit of Chemical Ecology, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.
Samwely M MakayulaDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Off Mlabani Passage, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Rickard IgnellDisease Vector Group, Unit of Chemical Ecology, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.
Ladslaus L Mnyone *Institute of Pest Management, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3110, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Sharon R Hill *Disease Vector Group, Unit of Chemical Ecology, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden. sharon.hill@slu.se.
Nicodem J GovellaDepartment of Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, Off Mlabani Passage, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SESokoine University of Agriculture · TZ

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T008873/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria vectors vary in feeding preference depending on their innate behaviour, host availability and abundance. Host preference and human biting rate in malaria vectors are key factors in establishing zooprophylaxis and zoopotentiation. This study aimed at assessing the impact of non-human hosts in close proximity to humans on the human biting rate of primary and secondary malaria vectors, with varying host preferences.

methodsThe effect of the presence of non-human hosts in close proximity to the human host on the mean catches per person per night, as a proxy for mosquito biting rate, was measured using mosquito-electrocuting traps (METs), in Sagamaganga, Kilombero Valley, Tanzania. Two experiments were designed: (1) a human versus a calf, each enclosed in a MET, and (2) a human surrounded by three calves versus a human alone, with each human volunteer enclosed individually in a MET spaced 10 m apart. Each experiment was conducted on alternate days and lasted for 36 nights per experiment. During each experiment, the positions of hosts were exchanged daily (except the human in experiment 2). All anopheline mosquitoes caught were assayed for Plasmodium sporozoites using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

resultsA total of 20,574 mosquitoes were captured and identified during the study, of which 3608 were anophelines (84.4% primary and 15.6% secondary malaria vectors) and 17,146 were culicines. In experiment 1, the primary malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis, along with Culex spp. demonstrated a preference for cattle, while the primary vectors, Anopheles funestus, preferred humans. In experiment 2, both primary vectors, An. arabiensis and An. funestus, as well as the secondary vector Anopheles rivolurum, demonstrated behaviours amenable to zooprophylaxis, whereas Culex spp. increased their attraction to humans in the presence of nearby cattle. All anopheline mosquitoes tested negative for sporozoites.

conclusionsThe findings of this study provide support for the zooprophylaxis model for malaria vectors present in the Kilombero Valley, and for the zoopotentiation model, as it pertains to the Culex spp. in the region. However, the factors regulating zooprophylaxis and zoopotentiation are complex, with different species-dependent mechanisms regulating these behaviours, that need to be considered when designing integrated vector management programmes.

Indexed as

AnophelesCulexInsect Bites and StingsMalariaAnimalsCattleFeeding BehaviorHumansMosquito VectorsSporozoitesTanzaniaAnophelesCattleCulexHost preferenceZoopotentiationZooprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID37940967
PMCPMC10631174
OpenAlexW4388492971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.