Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940928›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Disease awareness and healthcare utilization in rural South Africa: a comparative analysis of HIV and diabetes in the HAALSI cohort.

Erika T Beidelman, Till Bärnighausen, Coady Wing, Stephen Tollman, Meredith L Phillips, Molly Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erika T BeidelmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington, 1025 E. 7th St, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. ebeidelm@iu.edu.
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Coady WingO'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, USA.
Stephen TollmanMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt School of Public Health), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Meredith L PhillipsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington, 1025 E. 7th St, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Molly RosenbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington, 1025 E. 7th St, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.

Funding

Cumulative socioeconomic exposures, cash transfer interventions, and later-life cognitive decline and dementia risk in a low-income region of South AfricaR01AG069128 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Lindsay C Kobayashi, Molly Sears Rosenberg · 2020 to 2026
$4.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069128NIH HHS 1R01AG069128-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies from rural South Africa indicate that people living with HIV (PLHIV) may have better health outcomes than those without, potentially due to the frequent healthcare visits necessitated by infection. Here, we examined the association between HIV status and healthcare utilization, using diabetes as an illustrative comparator of another high-burden, healthcare-intensive disease.

methodsOur exposure of interest was awareness of positive disease status for both HIV and diabetes. We identified 742 individuals who were HIV-positive and aware of their status and 305 who had diabetes and were aware of their status. HIV-positive status was further grouped by viral suppression. For each disease, we estimated the association with (1) other comorbid, chronic conditions, (2) health facility visits, (3) household-level healthcare expenditure, and (4) per-visit healthcare expenditure. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate prevalence ratios for co-morbid chronic conditions. Linear regression models were used for all other outcomes.

resultsVirally suppressed PLHIV had decreased prevalence of chronic conditions, increased public clinic visits [β = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.5, 0.7], and reduced per-visit private clinic spending [β = -60, 95% CI: -83, -6] compared to those without HIV. No differences were observed in hospitalizations and per-visit spending at hospitals and public clinics between virally suppressed PLHIV and non-PLHIV. Conversely, diabetic individuals had increased prevalence of chronic conditions, increased visits across facility types, increased household-level expenditures (β = 88 R, 95% CI: 29, 154), per-visit hospital spending (β = 54 R, 95% CI: 7, 155), and per-visit public clinic spending (β = 31 R, 95% CI: 2, 74) compared to those without diabetes.

conclusionsOur results suggest that older adult PLHIV may visit public clinics more often than their HIV-negative counterparts but spend similarly on a per-visit basis. This provides preliminary evidence that the positive health outcomes observed among PLHIV in rural South Africa may be explained by different healthcare engagement patterns. Through our illustrative comparison between PLHIV and diabetics, we show that shifting disease burdens towards chronic and historically underfunded diseases, like diabetes, may be changing the landscape of health expenditure inequities.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHIV InfectionsAgedChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareSouth AfricaChronic DiseaseDiabetesHealthcare expenditureHealthcare utilizationHIV

Identifiers

PMID37940928
PMCPMC10634006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.