Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940788›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2024

Comparative biology and non-traditional approaches for basic aging research for facilitating translational studies.

Mary Ann Ottinger, Donna Holmes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Ann OttingerDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. maotting@central.uh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-3252
Donna HolmesWWAMI Medical Education Program, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844, USA.
University of Houston · USUniversity of Idaho · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As humans, we aspire to healthy aging and ideally reaching our maximal lifespan. That, however, requires optimizing resilience to stressors and minimizing exposure to factors that accelerate aging. Understanding the complexities of aging processes involves characterizing the causal bases of physical, physiological, and cognitive deficits that accumulate over time, eventually culminating in reduced functionality and decreased resistance to disease and environmental stressors. Both the progression of age-related conditions and onset of diseases are affected by environmental stressors; however, the basis for increased susceptibility remains poorly understood. Furthermore, the actions of some environmental stressors, such as endocrine disruptors, can alter both developmental and aging processes, contributing to lifelong issues with inflammatory and neurodegenerative conditions. This manuscript focuses on the comparative biology and evolution of aging and longevity. The status of an array of animal models and potential for specific geroscience translational applications is addressed by asking these questions. What animal models are currently available for aging and translational geroscience? What are the key roadblocks and barriers for studies of healthy aging, and how might specific animal models be useful? Are research tools available? Which vertebrate animal models can specifically address targeted questions in human aging processes? Can information be synthesized for a range of vertebrate species to identify suitable animal models for addressing specific research questions in geroscience, especially relative to basic physiological function, timing and trajectory of disease progression, effects of environmental stressors, and potential for regenerative medicine?

Indexed as

AgingGeroscienceAnimalsBiologyHumansLongevityModels, AnimalAging processesAnimal modelsComparative biology of agingEnvironmental stressorsGeroscienceLong-lived species

Identifiers

PMID37940788
PMCPMC11009194
OpenAlexW4388510329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.