Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940770›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Incidence rate and histology of appendiceal neoplasms in complicated versus uncomplicated appendicitis: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Paola Solis-Pazmino, Kimberly Oka, Kristina La, Orly Termeie, Luis A Figueroa, Eduardo Pilatuna, Daniel Solis-Pazmino, Mary Pat Harnegie, Jason Cohen, Moshe Barnajian and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Paola Solis-PazminoSurgery Group Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kimberly OkaSurgery Group Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kristina LaSurgery Group Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Orly TermeieSurgery Group Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Luis A FigueroaCaTaLiNA- Cancer de Tiroides en Latino América, Quito, Ecuador.
Eduardo PilatunaUniversidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Daniel Solis-PazminoFacultad de Odontología, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Mary Pat HarnegieCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jason CohenSurgery Group Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Moshe BarnajianSurgery Group Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yosef NasseriSurgery Group Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. yosefnasseri@gmail.com.
Central University of Ecuador · ECCleveland Clinic · USFacultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales · ECUniversidad San Francisco de Quito · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStudies evaluating the rate and histology of appendiceal neoplasms between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis include a small number of patients. Therefore, we sought a meta-analysis and systematic review comparing the rates and types of appendiceal neoplasm between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.

methodsWe included articles published from the time of inception of the datasets to September 30, 2022. The electronic databases included English publications in Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus.

resultsA total of 4962 patients with appendicitis enrolled in 4 comparative studies were included. The mean age was 43.55 years (16- 94), and half were male (51%). Based on intra-operative findings, 1394 (38%) had complicated appendicitis, and 3558 (62%) had uncomplicated appendicitis. The overall incidence rate of neoplasm was 1.98%. No significant difference was found in the incidence rate of appendiceal neoplasm between complicated (3.29%) and uncomplicated (1.49%) appendicitis (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.16- 1.23; p < 0.087; I2 = 54.9%). The most common appendiceal neoplasms were Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) (49.21%), Nonmucinous Adenocarcinoma (24.24%), Mixed Adeno-Neuroendocrine Tumor (MANEC) (11.40%), Mucinous Adenocarcinoma (4.44%). There was a significant difference between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in rates of adenocarcinoma (50% vs. 13%), NET (31% vs. 74%), MANEC (19% vs. 13%) (P < 0.001).

conclusionWhile there was no significant difference in the overall neoplasm rate between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis, the NET rate was significantly higher in uncomplicated appendicitis. In comparison, the Adenocarcinoma rate was considerably higher in Complicated appendicitis. These findings emphasize the importance of evaluating risk factors for neoplasm when considering appendectomy in patients with appendicitis.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAppendiceal NeoplasmsAppendicitisNeuroendocrine TumorsAdultAppendectomyFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAbscessAppendicitisComplicatedNeoplasmPerforationPhlegmonUncomplicated

Identifiers

PMID37940770
PMCPMC10632310
OpenAlexW4388537467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.