ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Development of artificial intelligence-based slow-motion echocardiography and clinical usefulness for evaluating regional wall motion abnormalities.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for Cardiac Wall Motion Analysis: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and Clinical Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Clinical obstacles to machine-learning POCUS adoption and system-wide AI implementation (The COMPASS-AI survey).The ultrasound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) for myocardial ischemia requires improvement, given that it currently depends on the physicians' experience and image quality. To address this issue, we aimed to develop artificial intelligence (AI)-based slow-motion echocardiography using inter-image interpolation. The clinical usefulness of this method was evaluated for detecting regional wall-motion abnormalities (RWMAs). In this study, an AI-based echocardiographic image-interpolation pipeline was developed using optical flow calculation and prediction for in-between images. The accuracy for detecting RWMAs and image readability among 25 patients with RWMA and 25 healthy volunteers was compared between four cardiologists using slow-motion and conventional ESE. Slow-motion echocardiography was successfully developed for arbitrary time-steps (e.g., 0.125×, and 0.5×) using 1,334 videos. The RWMA detection accuracy showed a numerical improvement, but it was not statistically significant (87.5% in slow-motion echocardiography vs. 81.0% in conventional ESE; odds ratio: 1.43 [95% CI: 0.78-2.62], p = 0.25). Interreader agreement analysis (Fleiss's Kappa) for detecting RWMAs among the four cardiologists were 0.66 (95%CI: 0.55-0.77) for slow-motion ESE and 0.53 (95%CI: 0.42-0.65) for conventional ESE. Additionally, subjective evaluations of image readability using a four-point scale showed a significant improvement for slow-motion echocardiography (2.11 ± 0.73 vs. 1.70 ± 0.78, p < 0.001).In conclusion, we successfully developed slow-motion echocardiography using in-between echocardiographic image interpolation. Although the accuracy for detecting RWMAs did not show a significant improvement with this method, we observed enhanced image readability and interreader agreement. This AI-based approach holds promise in supporting physicians' evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37940734What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.