Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940649›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2023

Prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer.

Subarnarekha Chatterji, Jan Moritz Niehues, Marko van Treeck, Chiara Maria Lavinia Loeffler, Oliver Lester Saldanha, Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen, Didem Cifci, Zunamys Itzell Carrero, Rasha Abu-Eid, Valerie Speirs and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Subarnarekha ChatterjiInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8980-4982
Jan Moritz NiehuesElse Kröner Fresenius Centre for Digital Health, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Marko van TreeckElse Kröner Fresenius Centre for Digital Health, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Chiara Maria Lavinia LoefflerElse Kröner Fresenius Centre for Digital Health, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9659-5194
Oliver Lester SaldanhaElse Kröner Fresenius Centre for Digital Health, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Gregory Patrick VeldhuizenElse Kröner Fresenius Centre for Digital Health, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Didem CifciElse Kröner Fresenius Centre for Digital Health, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Zunamys Itzell CarreroElse Kröner Fresenius Centre for Digital Health, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-1566
Rasha Abu-EidInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-0329
Valerie SpeirsInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. valerie.speirs@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0602-4666
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kröner Fresenius Centre for Digital Health, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Fresenius (Germany) · DEUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (Federal Ministry of Health, Germany) DEEP LIVERαBundesministerium für Gesundheit (Federal Ministry of Health, Germany) ZMVI1-2520DAT111Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid) 70113864Scottish Funding Council (SFC) Saltire Emerging Researcher European Exchange Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer prognosis and management for both men and women are reliant upon estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression to inform therapy. Previous studies have shown that there are sex-specific binding characteristics of ERα and PR in breast cancer and, counterintuitively, ERα expression is more common in male than female breast cancer. We hypothesized that these differences could have morphological manifestations that are undetectable to human observers but could be elucidated computationally. To investigate this, we trained attention-based multiple instance learning prediction models for ERα and PR using H&E-stained images of female breast cancer from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n = 1085) and deployed them on external female (n = 192) and male breast cancer images (n = 245). Both targets were predicted in the internal (AUROC for ERα prediction: 0.86 ± 0.02, p < 0.001; AUROC for PR prediction = 0.76 ± 0.03, p < 0.001) and external female cohorts (AUROC for ERα prediction: 0.78 ± 0.03, p < 0.001; AUROC for PR prediction = 0.80 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) but not the male cohort (AUROC for ERα prediction: 0.66 ± 0.14, p = 0.43; AUROC for PR prediction = 0.63 ± 0.04, p = 0.05). This suggests that subtle morphological differences invisible upon visual inspection may exist between the sexes, supporting previous immunohistochemical, genomic, and transcriptomic analyses.

Identifiers

PMID37940649
PMCPMC10632426
OpenAlexW4388486716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.