Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940637›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Suboptimal multisensory processing in pediatric migraine without aura: a comparative, cross-sectional study.

Gábor Braunitzer, Kálmán Tót, Gabriella Eördegh, András Hegedűs, Ádám Kiss, Jenő Kóbor, Ákos Pertich, Attila Nagy

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gábor BraunitzerLaboratory for Perception and Cognition and Clinical Neuroscience, Nyírő Gyula Hospital, Lehel Utca 59-61, Budapest, 1135, Hungary.
Kálmán TótDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Gabriella EördeghFaculty of Health Sciences and Social Studies, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
András HegedűsDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Ádám KissDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Jenő KóborDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Health Center, Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Ákos PertichDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Attila NagyDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. nagy.attila.1@med.u-szeged.hu.
University of Szeged · HUNational Institute of Menthal Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery - Nyírő Gyula Hospital · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations of sensory processing in migraine are well known. There is some evidence to suggest that multisensory processing is altered in migraine as well, but the area is underexplored, especially regarding pediatric migraine. A visual and an audiovisual version of the Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test paradigm was administered to pediatric patients with migraine without aura (aged 7-17.5 years) and to age- and sex-matched controls. The application of audiovisual stimuli significantly facilitated associative pair learning in migraine-free children and adolescents, but not in pediatric migraine patients. The results of this study corroborate the hypothesis that multisensory processing is altered in pediatric migraine without aura.

Indexed as

Migraine without AuraAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSensation

Identifiers

PMID37940637
PMCPMC10632508
OpenAlexW4388501167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.