Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940405›Full record

Trial reportTobacco control2025

Effects of 'Ice' flavoured e-cigarettes with synthetic cooling agent WS-23 or menthol on user-reported appeal and sensory attributes.

Alayna P Tackett, Dae Hee Han, Natalia Peraza, Reid C Whaley, Tyler Mason, Rael Cahn, Kurt Hong, Raina Pang, John Monterosso, Michelle K Page and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tobacco control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Sales of cigarettes with WS-3, a synthetic cooling agent, in an area with a menthol cigarette sales prohibition.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preventive medicine reports · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Toxicity and Appeal of Flavoured E-Cigarettes and Flavour Ban Outcomes: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alayna P TackettInternal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-141X
Dae Hee HanDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2929-5928
Natalia PerazaDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Reid C WhaleyDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Tyler MasonDepartment of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Rael CahnDepartment of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Kurt HongDepartment of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Raina PangDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
John MonterossoInstitute for Addiction Science, Univeresity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michelle K PageDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5962-8586
Maciej Lukasz GoniewiczDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6748-3068
Adam M LeventhalDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA adam.leventhal@usc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1217-525X
University of Southern California · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

USC Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceU54CA180905 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Raina Pang · 2018 to 2026
$39.0M
Tobacco Use Treatment Research for Vulnerable PopulationsK24DA048160 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Adam Matthew Leventhal · 2019 to 2026
$1.4M
Respiratory effects of E-Cigarette use among Youth: A prospective, longitudinal investigationK01HL148907 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TACKETT, ALAYNA PAULINE · 2019 to 2023
$981k
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA180905NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL148907NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA048160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis clinical experiment tested the effects of exposure to e-cigarettes with WS-23 or menthol cooling additives on user appeal and sensory attributes, and, secondarily, whether WS-23 effects generalised across base characterising flavour, nicotine concentration, or nicotine/tobacco product use status.

methodsIn this within-participant double-blind experiment, adult tobacco/nicotine users administered standardised puffs of 18 different e-cigarette solutions in randomised sequences using a pod-style device. Each of three base characterising e-cigarette flavour solutions ('bold tobacco', 'mango,' 'wintergreen') in both 2% and 4% concentrations of nicotine benzoate salt were manipulated by adding either: (1) Menthol (0.5%), (2) WS-23 (0.75%) or (3) No cooling agent. After each administration, participants rated 3 appeal and 5 sensory attributes (0-100 scales).

resultsParticipants (n=84; M(SD)=38.6 (13.6) years old) were either exclusive e-cigarette (25.0%), cigarette (36.9%) or dual (38.1%) users. WS-23 versus no coolant products produced higher liking, willingness to use again, smoothness, and coolness and lower disliking, bitterness, and harshness ratings (|B|

conclusionsAdding synthetic coolant WS-23 to e-cigarettes appears to make the vaping user experience more appealing, regardless of characterising base flavour. Regulatory agencies should be aware that the manufacturing process of adding synthetic coolants may increase the attractiveness of various e-cigarette products.Cite Now.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFlavoring AgentsMentholVapingAdultConsumer BehaviorDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotineTasteYoung AdultFlavoring AgentsMentholNicotineaddictionelectronic nicotine delivery devicespublic policy

Identifiers

PMID37940405
PMCPMC11076411
OpenAlexW4388501159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.