Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940157›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of therapies for psoriatic arthritis on patient-reported outcomes.

Peter Nash, Jan P Dutz, Steve Peterson, Barkha P Patel, Kiefer Eaton, May Shawi, Federico Zazzetti, James Cheng-Chung Wei

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter NashSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2571-788X
Jan P DutzDepartment of Dermatology and Skin Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Steve PetersonImmunology Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Janssen Global Services LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA.
Barkha P PatelEVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Kiefer EatonEVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
May ShawiImmunology Medical Affairs, Janssen Global Services LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA.
Federico ZazzettiImmunology Medical Affairs, Janssen Latin America, LLC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
James Cheng-Chung WeiDepartment of Allergy Immunology & Rheumatology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan jccwei@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1235-0679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHead-to-head clinical trials are common in psoriasis, but scarce in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), making treatment comparisons between therapeutic classes difficult. This study describes the relative effectiveness of targeted synthetic (ts) and biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) through network meta-analysis (NMA).

designA systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in January 2020. Bayesian NMAs were conducted to compare treatments on Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and 36-item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey including Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE (including Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily),Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating patients with PsA receiving tsDMARDS, bDMARDs or placebo were included in the SLR; there was no restriction on outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent researchers reviewed all citations. Data for studies meeting all inclusion criteria were extracted into a standardised Excel-based form by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. A third reviewer was consulted to resolve any discrepancies, as necessary. Risk of bias was assessed using the The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical effectiveness quality assessment checklist.

resultsIn total, 26 RCTs were included. For HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS scores, intravenous tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors generally ranked higher than most other classes of therapies available to treat patients with PsA. For almost all outcomes, several interleukin (IL)-23, IL-17A, subcutaneous TNF and IL-12/23 agents offered comparable improvement, while cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, phosphodiesterase-4 and Janus kinase inhibitors often had the lowest efficacy.

conclusionsWhile intravenous TNFs may provide some improvements in PROs relative to several other tsDMARDs and bDMARDs for the treatment of patients with PsA, differences between classes of therapies across outcomes were small.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, PsoriaticAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsAdult dermatologyPsoriasisRHEUMATOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID37940157
PMCPMC10632897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.