Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37939413›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics2024

Investigating pulse-echo sound speed estimation in breast ultrasound with deep learning.

Walter A Simson, Magdalini Paschali, Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa, Nassir Navab, Jeremy J Dahl

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep-Learning-Driven High Spatial Resolution Attenuation Imaging for Ultrasound Tomography (AI-UT).IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Spatial Ambiguity Correction in Coherence-Based Average Sound Speed Estimation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Walter A SimsonChair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: waltersimson@stanford.edu.
Magdalini PaschaliDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Vasiliki Sideri-LampretsaInstitute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nassir NavabChair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Chair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jeremy J DahlDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USTechnical University of Munich · DEJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Improving Liver Ultrasound Image Quality in Difficult-to-Image PatientsR01EB027100 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAHL, JEREMY · 2020 to 2023
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound is an adjunct tool to mammography that can quickly and safely aid physicians in diagnosing breast abnormalities. Clinical ultrasound often assumes a constant sound speed to form diagnostic B-mode images. However, the components of breast tissue, such as glandular tissue, fat, and lesions, differ in sound speed. Given a constant sound speed assumption, these differences can degrade the quality of reconstructed images via phase aberration. Sound speed images can be a powerful tool for improving image quality and identifying diseases if properly estimated. To this end, we propose a supervised deep-learning approach for sound speed estimation from analytic ultrasound signals. We develop a large-scale simulated ultrasound dataset that generates representative breast tissue samples by modeling breast gland, skin, and lesions with varying echogenicity and sound speed. We adopt a fully convolutional neural network architecture trained on a simulated dataset to produce an estimated sound speed map. The simulated tissue is interrogated with a plane wave transmit sequence, and the complex-value reconstructed images are used as input for the convolutional network. The network is trained on the sound speed distribution map of the simulated data, and the trained model can estimate sound speed given reconstructed pulse-echo signals. We further incorporate thermal noise augmentation during training to enhance model robustness to artifacts found in real ultrasound data. To highlight the ability of our model to provide accurate sound speed estimations, we evaluate it on simulated, phantom, and in-vivo breast ultrasound data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingSoundUltrasonographyUltrasonography, MammaryBreast imagingDeep learningSimulationSound speedUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37939413
PMCPMC10842235
OpenAlexW4388011517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.