Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37939301›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2023

What Controls the Quality of Photodynamical Simulations? Electronic Structure Versus Nonadiabatic Algorithm.

Jiří Janoš, Petr Slavíček

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Limitations of MRSF-TDDFT for Applications in Photochemistry.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Roadmap for Molecular Benchmarks in Nonadiabatic Dynamics.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Quantum Information Science Challenge for Chemistry.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Simulating Attochemistry: Which Dynamics Method to Use?The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiří JanošDepartment of Physical Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 16628 Prague 6, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5903-8538
Petr SlavíčekDepartment of Physical Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology, Technická 5, 16628 Prague 6, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-5538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of nonadiabatic dynamics has matured over the last decade with a range of algorithms and electronic structure methods available at the moment. While the community currently focuses more on developing and benchmarking new nonadiabatic dynamics algorithms, the underlying electronic structure controls the outcome of nonadiabatic simulations. Yet, the electronic-structure sensitivity analysis is typically neglected. In this work, we present a sensitivity analysis of the nonadiabatic dynamics of cyclopropanone to electronic structure methods and nonadiabatic dynamics algorithms. In particular, we compare wave function-based CASSCF, FOMO-CASCI, MS- and XMS-CASPT2, density-functional REKS, and semiempirical MRCI-OM3 electronic structure methods with the Landau-Zener surface hopping, fewest switches surface hopping, and

Identifiers

PMID37939301
PMCPMC10688183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.