ReviewAnnals of medicine2023
Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy.
Review in Annals of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- GOLDEN fusion: a graph-oriented learning with domain-embedding network fusion for generating super gene sets in functional genomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- M2 macrophage related genes predict prognosis and drug response in prostate cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Identification of Hub Neutrophil Coexpressed Genes in Acute PancreatitisEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Immune profiling identifies the contribution of extracellular vesicles to immune modulation and progression in prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- JUNB and JUND in Urological Cancers: A Literature Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of thymidine kinase 1 and folate receptor alpha as potential biomarkers in prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Current Evidence on Cabazitaxel for Prostate Cancer Therapy: A Narrative Review.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Review
- Precision Targeting in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Molecular Insights to Therapeutic Frontiers.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Article
- LncRNA LINC01128 promotes prostate cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by modulating miR-27b-3p.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Co-modulation of a circular form of PCDH11Y during neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Association of High Tumor-Stroma Ratio with Prostate Cancer Progression: Insights from Clinical and Genomic Data.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- A Review with a Focus onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Outsmarting Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Integration of Imaging, Liquid Biopsies and Biomarkers With Artificial Intelligence.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
- Molecular Drivers of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: Emerging Targets for Precision Therapy.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumour classifications play a pivotal role in prostate cancer (PCa) management. It can predict the clinical outcomes of PCa as early as the disease is diagnosed and then guide therapeutic schemes, such as active monitoring, standalone surgical intervention, or surgery supplemented with postoperative adjunctive therapy, thereby circumventing disease exacerbation and excessive treatment. Classifications based on clinicopathological features, such as prostate cancer-specific antigen, Gleason score, and TNM stage, are still the main risk stratification strategies and have played an essential role in standardized clinical decision-making. However, mounting evidence indicates that clinicopathological parameters in isolation fail to adequately capture the heterogeneity exhibited among distinct PCa patients, such as those sharing identical Gleason scores yet experiencing divergent prognoses. As a remedy, molecular classifications have been introduced. Currently, molecular studies have revealed the characteristic genomic alterations, epigenetic modulations, and tumour microenvironment associated with different types of PCa, which provide a chance for urologists to refine the PCa classification. In this context, numerous invaluable molecular classifications have been devised, employing disparate statistical methodologies and algorithmic approaches, encompassing self-organizing map clustering, unsupervised cluster analysis, and multifarious algorithms. Interestingly, the classifier PAM50 was used in a phase-2 multicentre open-label trial, NRG-GU-006, for further validation, which hints at the promise of molecular classification for clinical use. Consequently, this review examines the extant molecular classifications, delineates the prevailing panorama of clinically pertinent molecular signatures, and delves into eight emblematic molecular classifications, dissecting their methodological underpinnings and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.