ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
Functional Changes of the Ocular Surface Sensory Nerves Due to Contact Lens Use in Young Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Users.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tear aqueous production rate between symptomatic and asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in corneal sensory nerve functionality in young asymptomatic (CL-A) and symptomatic (CL-S) contact lens (CL) users. Methods: CL wearers (23.8 ± 1.0 years, n = 31) were classified as CL-S with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) ≥ 13 (n = 14) or CL-A. Users of eye glasses (EG; 24.5 ± 0.8 years, n = 29) with OSDI < 13 participated as controls. The sensations evoked by mechanical, chemical (gas esthesiometer), and cold (4°C saline drops) stimuli were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VASs). Moreover, tear volume, tear break up time (TBUT), blinking frequency (BF), and ocular surface temperature (OST; IR thermography) were also measured. Results: Mechanical and chemical stimuli produced similar scores in the CL-A and EG participants, although the CL-A subjects referred to stronger irritation (p < 0.05). Likewise, the VAS intensity in response to cold stimuli did not differ between CL-A and EG subjects, while the ability to detect cold was significantly worse in CL-S users (p < 0.05). CL-A users had a similar tear volume, a higher BF (p < 0.01) and shorter TBUT (p < 0.001) to EG wearers, and blinking and TBUT were also altered significantly in CL-S users (p < 0.01). Interestingly, the OST was significantly lower in CL-A users (p < 0.05) than in EG wearers, but not in CL-S users. Conclusions: Using CLs modifies corneal sensitivity, blinking and tearing in young volunteers. Even if they have yet to develop clinical signs of inflammation, they display changes in corneal sensitivity consistent with the sensitization of corneal nociceptors and the inhibition cold thermoreceptors, phenomena that occur under inflammatory conditions. The differences in corneal sensitivity and OST between CL-A and CL-S users could reflect the extent of nerve damage and inflammation at the ocular surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.