Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938744›Full record

ArticleISME communications2022

Biogeographical and seasonal dynamics of the marine Roseobacter community and ecological links to DMSP-producing phytoplankton.

James O'Brien, Erin L McParland, Anna R Bramucci, Nachshon Siboni, Martin Ostrowski, Tim Kahlke, Naomi M Levine, Mark V Brown, Jodie van de Kamp, Levente Bodrossy and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Divergent evolution of the PRPS enzymes across the tree of life.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome-resolved adaptation strategies ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

James O'BrienClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia. james.obrien@student.uts.edu.au.
Erin L McParlandDepartment of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.
Anna R BramucciClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.
Nachshon SiboniClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.
Martin OstrowskiClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.
Tim KahlkeClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.
Naomi M LevineDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mark V BrownSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Jodie van de KampCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Levente BodrossyCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Lauren F MesserClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.
Katherina PetrouSchool of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.
Justin R SeymourClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia. justin.seymour@uts.edu.au.

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) 180100838Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DP140101045Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) FT130100218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological interactions between marine bacteria and phytoplankton play a pivotal role in governing the ocean's major biogeochemical cycles. Among these, members of the marine Roseobacter Group (MRG) can establish mutualistic relationships with phytoplankton that are, in part, maintained by exchanges of the organosulfur compound, dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP). Yet most of what is known about these interactions has been derived from culture-based laboratory studies. To investigate temporal and spatial co-occurrence patterns between members of the MRG and DMSP-producing phytoplankton we analysed 16S and 18S rRNA gene amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) derived from 5 years of monthly samples from seven environmentally distinct Australian oceanographic time-series. The MRG and DMSP-producer communities often displayed contemporaneous seasonality, which was greater in subtropical and temperate environments compared to tropical environments. The relative abundance of both groups varied latitudinally, displaying a poleward increase, peaking (MRG at 33% of total bacteria, DMSP producers at 42% of eukaryotic phototrophs) during recurrent spring-summer phytoplankton blooms in the most temperate site (Maria Island, Tasmania). Network analysis identified 20,140 significant positive correlations between MRG ASVs and DMSP producers and revealed that MRGs exhibit significantly stronger correlations to high DMSP producers relative to other DMSP-degrading bacteria (Pelagibacter, SAR86 and Actinobacteria). By utilising the power of a continental network of oceanographic time-series, this study provides in situ confirmation of interactions found in laboratory studies and demonstrates that the ecological dynamics of an important group of marine bacteria are shaped by the production of an abundant and biogeochemically significant organosulfur compound.

Identifiers

PMID37938744
PMCPMC9723663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.