Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938690›Full record

ReviewISME communications2022

Machine learning and deep learning applications in microbiome research.

Ricardo Hernández Medina, Svetlana Kutuzova, Knud Nor Nielsen, Joachim Johansen, Lars Hestbjerg Hansen, Mads Nielsen, Simon Rasmussen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ISME communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Meta-Analysis of the Gut Microbiome: An African American Representation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ricardo Hernández MedinaNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6373-2362
Svetlana KutuzovaNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0908-5747
Knud Nor NielsenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Joachim JohansenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Lars Hestbjerg HansenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-1871, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0027-1524
Mads NielsenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. madsn@di.ku.dk.
Simon RasmussenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark. simon.rasmussen@cpr.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-9041

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF14CC0001Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF19SA0059348Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF20SA0035590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The many microbial communities around us form interactive and dynamic ecosystems called microbiomes. Though concealed from the naked eye, microbiomes govern and influence macroscopic systems including human health, plant resilience, and biogeochemical cycling. Such feats have attracted interest from the scientific community, which has recently turned to machine learning and deep learning methods to interrogate the microbiome and elucidate the relationships between its composition and function. Here, we provide an overview of how the latest microbiome studies harness the inductive prowess of artificial intelligence methods. We start by highlighting that microbiome data - being compositional, sparse, and high-dimensional - necessitates special treatment. We then introduce traditional and novel methods and discuss their strengths and applications. Finally, we discuss the outlook of machine and deep learning pipelines, focusing on bottlenecks and considerations to address them.

Identifiers

PMID37938690
PMCPMC9723725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.