ArticleISME communications2022
Repeated introduction of micropollutants enhances microbial succession despite stable degradation patterns.
Article in ISME communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pollutant biodegradation profile mediated by multi-trophic microbial dynamics in rivers.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Potentiators empower synthetic microbiomes as silent guardians against co-contamination.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Spatial Gradient Effects of Metal Pollution: Assessing Ecological Risks Through the Lens of Fish Gut Microbiota.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- EcoImprove: Revealing aquatic ecological effects of micropollutant discharge from municipal wastewater treatment plants.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- COVID-19 pandemic-related drugs and microplastics from mask fibers jointly affect soil functions and processes.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Response and recovery mechanisms of river microorganisms to gradient concentrations of estrogen.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing-volume release of micropollutants into natural surface waters has raised great concern due to their environmental accumulation. Persisting micropollutants can impact multiple generations of organisms, but their microbially-mediated degradation and their influence on community assembly remain understudied. Here, freshwater microbes were treated with several common micropollutants, alone or in combination, and then transferred every 5 days to fresh medium containing the same micropollutants to mimic the repeated exposure of microbes. Metabarcoding of 16S rRNA gene makers was chosen to study the succession of bacterial assemblages following micropollutant exposure. The removal rates of micropollutants were then measured to assess degradation capacity of the associated communities. The degradation of micropollutants did not accelerate over time but altered the microbial community composition. Community assembly was dominated by stochastic processes during early exposure, via random community changes and emergence of seedbanks, and deterministic processes later in the exposure, via advanced community succession. Early exposure stages were characterized by the presence of sensitive microorganisms such as Actinobacteria and Planctomycetes, which were then replaced by more tolerant bacteria such as Bacteroidetes and Gammaproteobacteria. Our findings have important implication for ecological feedback between microbe-micropollutants under anthropogenic climate change scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.