Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938632›Full record

ArticleISME communications2021

Critical evaluation of faecal microbiome preservation using metagenomic analysis.

Alena L Pribyl, Donovan H Parks, Nicola Z Angel, Joel A Boyd, Alexander G Hasson, Liang Fang, Samantha L MacDonald, Blake A Wills, David L A Wood, Lutz Krause and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improving immune-related health outcomes post-cesarean birth with a gut microbiome-based program: A randomized controlled trial.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Omnigene-GutAMB Express · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alena L PribylMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. alena.pribyl@microba.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7625-5259
Donovan H ParksMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nicola Z AngelMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Joel A BoydMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Alexander G HassonMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-9203
Liang FangMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Samantha L MacDonaldMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Blake A WillsMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
David L A WoodMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Lutz KrauseMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Gene W TysonMicroba Life Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-9427
Philip HugenholtzAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-7925
The University of Queensland · AUTranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to preserve microbial communities in faecal samples is essential as increasing numbers of studies seek to use the gut microbiome to identify biomarkers of disease. Here we use shotgun metagenomics to rigorously evaluate the technical and compositional reproducibility of five room temperature (RT) microbial stabilisation methods compared to the best practice of flash-freezing. These methods included RNALater, OMNIGene-GUT, a dry BBL swab, LifeGuard, and a novel method for preserving faecal samples, a Copan FLOQSwab in an active drying tube (FLOQSwab-ADT). Each method was assessed using six replicate faecal samples from five participants, totalling 180 samples. The FLOQSwab-ADT performed best for both technical and compositional reproducibility, followed by RNAlater and OMNIgene-GUT. LifeGuard and the BBL swab had unpredictable outgrowth of Escherichia species in at least one replicate from each participant. We further evaluated the FLOQSwab-ADT in an additional 239 samples across 10 individuals after storage at -20 °C, RT, and 50 °C for four weeks compared to fresh controls. The FLOQSwab-ADT maintained its performance across all temperatures, indicating this method is an excellent alternative to existing RT stabilisation methods.

Identifiers

PMID37938632
PMCPMC9645250
OpenAlexW3160727874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.