ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2024
Multifunctionalised skin substitute of hybrid gelatin-polyvinyl alcohol bioinks for chronic wound: injectable vs. 3D bioprinting.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart hydrogel systems for skin fibrosis: rational design, mechanisms and therapeutic applications.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Kelulut Honey-Incorporated Hybrid Gelatin-PVA Hydrogel for Wound Healing: Fabrication and In Vitro Characterization.Polymers · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Honey-Containing Hydrogel for Wound Healing Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic wounds are challenging to heal and increase global mortality. The effectiveness of skin graft is limited by rejection, fibrosis, and inadequate donor site. Multifunctionalised-hydrogel skin substitutes promoted higher wound healing by maintaining the moisture microenvironment and permit gas exchange/nourishment in prolong cell viability/activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a skin substitute using two strategies; via injectable and 3D bioprinting technique. New hydrogel formulations that composed of gelatin (GE) and polyvinyl-alcohol (PVA) were constructed using a pre-mix crosslinking approach with genipin (GNP) to generate the biodegradable and biocompatible skin substitute with reduced secondary traumatic wound. GPVA5_GNP (6% GE: 5% PVA crosslinked with GNP) was the most stable hydrogel for wound healing application with the longest enzymatic degradation and stable hydrogel for absorption of excess wound exudates. Primary human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) migrated extensively through 3D bioprinted hydrogels with larger average pore sizes and interconnected pores than injectable hydrogels. Moreover, 3D bioprinted GPVA hydrogels were biocompatible with HDFs and demonstrated > 90% cell viability. HDFs maintained their phenotype and positively expressed collagen type-I, vinculin, short and dense F-actin, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and Ki67. Additionally, the presence of GNP demonstrated antioxidant capacity and high-ability of angiogenesis. The utilisation of the 3D bioprinting (layer-by-layer) approach did not compromise the HDFs' growth capacity and biocompatibility with selected bioinks. In conclusion, it allows the cell encapsulation sustainability in a hydrogel matrix for a longer period, in promoting tissue regeneration and accelerating healing capacity, especially for difficult or chronic wound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37938542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.