Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938501›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2024

Development and validation of the Workplace Learning Inventory in Health Sciences Education: a multimethod study.

Evelyn Steinberg, Stephan Marsch, Takuya Yanagida, Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, Christopher Pfeiffer, Petra Bührle, Lukas Schwarz, Ulrike Auer, Christin Kleinsorgen, Franziska Perels

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evelyn SteinbergVice-Rectorate for Study Affairs and Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria. evelyn.steinberg@vetmeduni.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-3675
Stephan MarschVice-Rectorate for Study Affairs and Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Takuya YanagidaVice-Rectorate for Study Affairs and Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Laura Dörrenbächer-UlrichDepartment of Educational Science, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Christopher PfeifferVice-Rectorate for Study Affairs and Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Petra BührleVice-Rectorate for Study Affairs and Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lukas SchwarzClinic for Swine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrike AuerUniversity Hospital for Small Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christin KleinsorgenCentre for E-Learning, Didactics and Educational Research, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany.
Franziska PerelsDepartment of Educational Science, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P 33913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health sciences students face many challenges in regard to clinical practical learning. A better understanding of student learning is required to address student needs in this crucial phase. The theory of self-regulated learning provides a comprehensive view of learning and could serve as a basis for further research. There are instruments to assess self-regulated learning in preclinical academic learning. However, there are no such instruments for workplace learning. The aim of the present study is to provide a comprehensive inventory from which researchers can select those scales that are relevant to their research questions in the investigation of workplace learning. Hence, the aim is to develop and validate a set of scales to assess undergraduates' workplace learning in health sciences education in four areas (cognition, motivation, emotion, and context) on two levels (the learning process level and the metalevel). Study 1 is a qualitative multimethod study to identify indicators and develop items. It integrates the perspectives of students, teachers, and researchers and includes six steps: literature review, interviews, synthesis, item development, expert review, and cognitive pretesting. This study yields a set of scales for each area on both levels. Study 2 is a quantitative study to assess the psychometric properties. The results show acceptable values in terms of unidimensionality, reliability and validity for each of the 31 scales. The newly developed Workplace Learning Inventory is comprehensive; the scales are relevant to workplace learning and short enough that their administration is feasible in the workplace setting. The rigorous process of questionnaire development contributes to the validity of scales. By providing the Workplace Learning Inventory, we hope to encourage research on workplace learning in health sciences education from an educational psychology perspective.

Indexed as

LearningPsychometricsWorkplaceAdultCognitionEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMotivationReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAcademic emotionAcademic motivationHealth sciences educationLearning environmentLearning strategiesQuestionnaireSelf-regulated learningWorkplace learning

Identifiers

PMID37938501
PMCPMC11369049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.