Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938474›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Establishment and Feasibility of an Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Program in a Community Health System.

Pranav N Haravu, Afaaf Shakir, Katherine Jackson, Duanny Alva, Joseph Feldman, Mark Sisco, Akhil K Seth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pranav N HaravuSection of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Afaaf ShakirSection of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Katherine JacksonDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Duanny AlvaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Joseph FeldmanDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Mark SiscoDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
Akhil K SethDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA. akhilseth@gmail.com.
NorthShore University HealthSystem · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) remains a significant post-surgical complication of breast cancer treatment. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has shown promise in preventing BCRL. While the primary literature supporting ILR comes from academic institutions, the majority of breast cancer care in the USA occurs in the community setting. This study evaluated a preventative lymphedema program performing ILR at a community health system. PATIENTS AND

methodsA prospective database including all patients who underwent ALND with concurrently attempted ILR from 2019 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. The historical benchmark lymphedema rate was calculated through retrospective review of electronic medical records for all patients who underwent ALND without ILR from 2011 to 2021.

resultsNinety patients underwent ALND with ILR, of which ILR was successful in 69 (76.7%). ILR was more likely to be aborted in smokers (p < 0.05) and those with fewer lymphatic channels (p < 0.05) or a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.08). Patients with successful versus aborted ILR had lower lymphedema rates (10.9% versus 66.7%, p < 0.01) and improved Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (8.7 versus 19.8, p = 0.25), and lower lymphedema rates than the historical benchmark (10.9% versus 50.2%, p < 0.01). Among patients with successful ILR, older patients were more likely to develop lymphedema (p < 0.05).

conclusionsSuccessful ILR after ALND significantly reduced the lymphedema rate when compared with patients with aborted ILR and our institution's historical benchmark. Our experience supports the efficacy of ILR and highlights the feasibility of ILR within a community health system.

Indexed as

Breast Cancer LymphedemaBreast NeoplasmsLymphedemaAxillaCommunity Health PlanningFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37938474
OpenAlexW4388500119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.