Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938447›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of epidemiology2024

Methodological approaches, challenges, and opportunities in the application of Mendelian randomisation to lifecourse epidemiology: A systematic literature review.

Grace M Power, Eleanor Sanderson, Panagiota Pagoni, Abigail Fraser, Tim Morris, Claire Prince, Timothy M Frayling, Jon Heron, Tom G Richardson, Rebecca Richmond and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Personality Genomics.Annual review of psychology · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Evidence triangulation in health research.European journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Grace M PowerMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. grace.power@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-7728
Eleanor SandersonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Panagiota PagoniMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abigail FraserMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Tim MorrisCentre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Claire PrinceMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Timothy M FraylingGenetics of Complex Traits, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jon HeronMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Tom G RichardsonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rebecca RichmondMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jessica TyrrellGenetics of Complex Traits, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Nicole Warrington *Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Laura D Howe *MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kate M Tilling *MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences SBF004\1079Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/2Medical Research Council MR/T002239/1MRF MC_UU_00011/1MRF MC_UU_00011/6MRF MR/N0137941/1MRF MR/T002239/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diseases diagnosed in adulthood may have antecedents throughout (including prenatal) life. Gaining a better understanding of how exposures at different stages in the lifecourse influence health outcomes is key to elucidating the potential benefits of disease prevention strategies. Mendelian randomisation (MR) is increasingly used to estimate causal effects of exposures across the lifecourse on later life outcomes. This systematic literature review explores MR methods used to perform lifecourse investigations and reviews previous work that has utilised MR to elucidate the effects of factors acting at different stages of the lifecourse. We conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, Medline and MedRXiv databases. Thirteen methodological studies were identified. Four studies focused on the impact of time-varying exposures in the interpretation of "standard" MR techniques, five presented methods for repeat measures of the same exposure, and four described methodological approaches to handling multigenerational exposures. A further 127 studies presented the results of an applied research question. Over half of these estimated effects in a single generation and were largely confined to the exploration of questions regarding body composition. The remaining mostly estimated maternal effects. There is a growing body of research focused on the development and application of MR methods to address lifecourse research questions. The underlying assumptions require careful consideration and the interpretation of results rely on select conditions. Whilst we do not advocate for a particular strategy, we encourage practitioners to make informed decisions on how to approach a research question in this field with a solid understanding of the limitations present and how these may be affected by the research question, modelling approach, instrument selection, and data availability.

Indexed as

Mendelian Randomization AnalysisCausalityFemaleHumansPregnancyLifecourseMendelian randomisationMethodologySystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID37938447
PMCPMC7616129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.