Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938394›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2023

Continuous chest compressions are associated with higher peak inspiratory pressures when compared to 30:2 in an experimental cardiac arrest model.

Johan Mälberg, Silvia Marchesi, Douglas Spangler, Nermin Hadziosmanovic, David Smekal, Sten Rubertsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johan MälbergDepartment of Surgical Sciences-Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. johan.malberg@surgsci.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4289-8202
Silvia MarchesiDivision of Intensive- and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Douglas SpanglerDepartment of Surgical Sciences-Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nermin HadziosmanovicUppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
David SmekalDepartment of Surgical Sciences-Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sten RubertssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences-Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has long been a part of the standard treatment during cardiac arrests. Ventilation is usually given either during continuous chest compressions (CCC) or during a short pause after every 30 chest compressions (30:2). There is limited knowledge of how ventilation is delivered if it effects the hemodynamics and if it plays a role in the occurrence of lung injuries. The aim of this study was to compare ventilation parameters, hemodynamics, blood gases and lung injuries during experimental CPR given with CCC and 30:2 in a porcine model.

methodsSixteen pigs weighing approximately 33 kg were randomized to either receive CPR with CCC or 30:2. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by passing an electrical current through the heart. CPR was started after 3 min and given for 20 min. Chest compressions were provided mechanically with a chest compression device and ventilations were delivered manually with a self-inflating bag and 12 l/min of oxygen. During the experiment, ventilation parameters and hemodynamics were sampled continuously, and arterial blood gases were taken every five minutes. After euthanasia and cessation of CPR, the lungs and heart were removed in block and visually examined followed by sampling of lung tissue which were examined using microscopy.

resultsIn the CCC group and the 30:2 group, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was 58.6 and 35.1 cmH

conclusionsVentilation during CCC resulted in a higher PIP, MV and pH and lower PECO

Indexed as

Animal modelCardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationLung injuriesVentilation

Identifiers

PMID37938394
PMCPMC10632261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.