Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938387›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2024

Prognostic factors to identify resolution of small bowel obstruction without need for operative management: systematic review.

Vivienne N Eze, Tom Parry, Darren Boone, Sue Mallett, Steve Halligan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical performance of the Antoine Béclère score in predicting operative requirement in adhesive small bowel obstruction.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High bilirubin and blood urea nitrogen predict intestinal necrosis in incarcerated groin hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vivienne N EzeCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London UCL, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Tom ParryCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London UCL, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Darren BooneCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London UCL, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Sue MallettCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London UCL, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Steve HalliganCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London UCL, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK. s.halligan@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0632-5108

Funding

UCLH Biomedical Research Centre UCLH Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify imaging, clinical, and laboratory variables potentially prognostic for surgical management of small bowel obstruction.

methodsTwo researchers systematically reviewed indexed literature 2001-2021 inclusive for imaging, clinical, and laboratory variables potentially predictive of surgical management of small bowl obstruction and/or ischaemia at surgery, where performed. Risk of bias was assessed. Contingency tables for variables reported in at least 5 studies were extracted and meta-analysed to identify strong evidence of association with clinical outcomes, across studies.

resultsThirty-one studies were ultimately included, reporting 4638 patients (44 to 313 per study). 11 (35%) studies raised no risk of bias concerns. CT was the modality reported most (29 studies, 94%). Meta-analysis of 21 predictors identified 5 strongly associated with surgical intervention, 3 derived from CT (peritoneal free fluid, odds ratio [OR] 3.24, 95%CI 2.45 to 4.29; high grade obstruction, OR 3.58, 95%CI 2.46 to 5.20; mesenteric inflammation, OR 2.61, 95%CI 1.94 to 3.50; abdominal distension, OR 2.43, 95%CI 1.34 to 4.42; peritonism, OR 3.97, 95%CI 2.67 to 5.90) and one with conservative management (previous abdominopelvic surgery, OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.85). Meta-analysis of 10 predictors identified 3 strongly associated with ischaemia at surgery, 2 derived from CT (peritoneal free fluid, OR 3.49, 95%CI 2.28 to 5.35; bowel thickening, OR 3.26 95%CI 1.91 to 5.55; white cell count, OR 4.76, 95%CI 2.71 to 8.36).

conclusionsSystematic review of patients with small bowel obstruction identified four imaging, three clinical, and one laboratory predictors associated strongly with surgical intervention and/or ischaemia at surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Via systematic review and meta-analysis, we identified imaging, clinical, and laboratory predictors strongly associated with surgical management of small bowel obstruction and/or ischaemia. Multivariable model development to guide management should incorporate these since they display strong evidence of potential utility. KEY POINTS: • While multivariable models incorporating clinical, laboratory, and imaging factors could predict surgical management of small bowel obstruction, none are used widely. • Via systematic review and meta-analysis we identified imaging, clinical, and laboratory variables strongly associated with surgical management and/or ischaemia at surgery. • Development of multivariable models to guide management should incorporate these predictors, notably CT scanning, since they display strong evidence of potential utility.

Indexed as

Intestinal ObstructionIntestine, SmallHumansPrognosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedCTIntestinal ischaemiaIntestinal obstructionMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37938387
PMCPMC11166786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.