ArticlePediatric research2024
Effects of Nasal Respiratory Support on Laryngeal and Esophageal Reflexes in Preterm Lambs.
Article in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Should nasal respiratory support in preterm infants be tailored for physiologic maturity?Pediatric research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSignificant cardiorespiratory events can be triggered in preterm infants as part of laryngeal chemoreflexes (LCRs) and esophageal reflexes (ERs). We previously showed that nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) blunted the cardiorespiratory inhibition induced with LCRs. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of nCPAP and high-flow nasal cannulas (HFNC) on the cardiorespiratory events induced during LCRs and ERs. The hypothesis is that nCPAP but not HFNC decreases the cardiorespiratory inhibition observed during LCRs and ERs.
methodsEleven preterm lambs were instrumented to record respiration, ECG, oxygenation, and states of alertness. LCRs and ERs were induced during non-rapid eye movement sleep in a random order under these conditions: nCPAP 6 cmH
resultsnCPAP 6 cmH
conclusionsnCPAP might be a treatment for cardiorespiratory events related to LCRs in newborns, either in the context of laryngopharyngeal refluxes or swallowing immaturity. Our preclinical results merit to be confirmed through clinical studies. IMPACT: Laryngeal chemoreflexes can be responsible for significant cardiorespiratory inhibition in newborns, especially preterm. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure at 6 cmH
Indexed as
Identifiers
37938316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.