Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938315›Full record

ArticleISME communications2022

Experimental transmission of Stony Coral Tissue Loss Disease results in differential microbial responses within coral mucus and tissue.

Naomi Huntley, Marilyn E Brandt, Cynthia C Becker, Carolyn A Miller, Sonora S Meiling, Adrienne M S Correa, Daniel M Holstein, Erinn M Muller, Laura D Mydlarz, Tyler B Smith and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Novel metagenomics analysis of stony coral tissue loss disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Shifts in the coral microbiome in response toApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Naomi HuntleyCenter for Marine and Environmental Studies, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, USVI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8245-8212
Marilyn E BrandtCenter for Marine and Environmental Studies, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, USVI, USA.
Cynthia C BeckerMarine Chemistry and Geochemistry Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.
Carolyn A MillerMarine Chemistry and Geochemistry Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9378-1974
Sonora S MeilingCenter for Marine and Environmental Studies, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, USVI, USA.
Adrienne M S CorreaDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Daniel M HolsteinDepartment of Oceanography and Coastal Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Erinn M MullerMote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-2064
Laura D MydlarzDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Tyler B SmithCenter for Marine and Environmental Studies, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, USVI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5256-6087
Amy ApprillMarine Chemistry and Geochemistry Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA. aapprill@whoi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-2977

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 0814417National Science Foundation (NSF) 19228771National Science Foundation (NSF) 1927277National Science Foundation (NSF) 1928609National Science Foundation (NSF) 1928753National Science Foundation (NSF) 1928761National Science Foundation (NSF) 1928817National Science Foundation (NSF) 1938112National Science Foundation (NSF) 1946412National Science Foundation (NSF) 2109622United States Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) NA19OAR4320074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) is a widespread and deadly disease that affects nearly half of Caribbean coral species. To understand the microbial community response to this disease, we performed a disease transmission experiment on US Virgin Island (USVI) corals, exposing six species of coral with varying susceptibility to SCTLD. The microbial community of the surface mucus and tissue layers were examined separately using a small subunit ribosomal RNA gene-based sequencing approach, and data were analyzed to identify microbial community shifts following disease acquisition, potential causative pathogens, as well as compare microbiota composition to field-based corals from the USVI and Florida outbreaks. While all species displayed similar microbiome composition with disease acquisition, microbiome similarity patterns differed by both species and mucus or tissue microhabitat. Further, disease exposed but not lesioned corals harbored a mucus microbial community similar to those showing disease signs, suggesting that mucus may serve as an early warning detection for the onset of SCTLD. Like other SCTLD studies in Florida, Rhodobacteraceae, Arcobacteraceae, Desulfovibrionaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae, Fusibacter, Marinifilaceae, and Vibrionaceae dominated diseased corals. This study demonstrates the differential response of the mucus and tissue microorganisms to SCTLD and suggests that mucus microorganisms may be diagnostic for early disease exposure.

Identifiers

PMID37938315
PMCPMC9723713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.