Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37938222›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

replicAnt: a pipeline for generating annotated images of animals in complex environments using Unreal Engine.

Fabian Plum, René Bulla, Hendrik K Beck, Natalie Imirzian, David Labonte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabian PlumDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. fabian.plum18@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1012-6646
René BullaThe Pocket Dimension, Muenchen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-3614-6704
Hendrik K BeckDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0876-5716
Natalie ImirzianDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David LabonteDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. d.labonte@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1952-8732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning-based computer vision methods are transforming animal behavioural research. Transfer learning has enabled work in non-model species, but still requires hand-annotation of example footage, and is only performant in well-defined conditions. To help overcome these limitations, we developed replicAnt, a configurable pipeline implemented in Unreal Engine 5 and Python, designed to generate large and variable training datasets on consumer-grade hardware. replicAnt places 3D animal models into complex, procedurally generated environments, from which automatically annotated images can be exported. We demonstrate that synthetic data generated with replicAnt can significantly reduce the hand-annotation required to achieve benchmark performance in common applications such as animal detection, tracking, pose-estimation, and semantic segmentation. We also show that it increases the subject-specificity and domain-invariance of the trained networks, thereby conferring robustness. In some applications, replicAnt may even remove the need for hand-annotation altogether. It thus represents a significant step towards porting deep learning-based computer vision tools to the field.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationAnimalsModels, AnimalSemanticsUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID37938222
PMCPMC10632501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.