Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37937840›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis.

Ali Motahharynia, Ahmad Pourmohammadi, Armin Adibi, Vahid Shaygannejad, Fereshteh Ashtari, Iman Adibi, Mehdi Sanayei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali Motahharynia *Center for Translational Neuroscience, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-3257
Ahmad Pourmohammadi *Center for Translational Neuroscience, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-0569
Armin AdibiCenter for Translational Neuroscience, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Vahid ShaygannejadCenter for Translational Neuroscience, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Fereshteh AshtariCenter for Translational Neuroscience, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Iman AdibiCenter for Translational Neuroscience, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4409-9404
Mehdi SanayeiCenter for Translational Neuroscience, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3593-8018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is one of the most affected cognitive domains in multiple sclerosis (MS), which is mainly studied by the previously established binary model for information storage (slot model). However, recent observations based on the continuous reproduction paradigms have shown that assuming dynamic allocation of WM resources (resource model) instead of the binary hypothesis will give more accurate predictions in WM assessment. Moreover, continuous reproduction paradigms allow for assessing the distribution of error in recalling information, providing new insights into the organization of the WM system. Hence, by utilizing two continuous reproduction paradigms, memory-guided localization (MGL) and analog recall task with sequential presentation, we investigated WM dysfunction in MS. Our results demonstrated an overall increase in recall error and decreased recall precision in MS. While sequential paradigms were better in distinguishing healthy control from relapsing-remitting MS, MGL were more accurate in discriminating MS subtypes (relapsing-remitting from secondary progressive), providing evidence about the underlying mechanisms of WM deficit in progressive states of the disease. Furthermore, computational modeling of the results from the sequential paradigm determined that imprecision in decoding information and swap error (mistakenly reporting the feature of other presented items) was responsible for WM dysfunction in MS. Overall, this study offered a sensitive measure for assessing WM deficit and provided new insight into the organization of the WM system in MS population.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermMultiple SclerosisCognitionHumansMemory DisordersMental RecallNeoplasm Recurrence, Localbindinghumanmultiple sclerosisneuroscienceresource modelswap errorworking memory

Identifiers

PMID37937840
PMCPMC10631758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.