Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37937737›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2024

Decomposing the late positive potential to cannabis cues in regular cannabis users: A temporal-spatial principal component analysis.

Thomas J Preston, Jesse R Cougle, Norman B Schmidt, Richard J Macatee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J PrestonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-1999
Jesse R CougleDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Norman B SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Richard J MacateeDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
Auburn University · USFlorida State University · US

Funding

Computerized Intervention for Distress IntoleranceF31DA039644 · NIDA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MACATEE, RICHARD · 2016 to 2017
$59k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA039644NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA039644-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is increasing in the United States, yet, specific neural mechanisms of CUD are not well understood. Disordered substance use is characterized by heightened drug cue incentive salience, which can be measured using the late positive potential (LPP), an event-related potential (ERP) evoked by motivationally significant stimuli. The drug cue LPP is typically quantified by averaging the slow wave's scalp-recorded amplitude across its entire time course, which may obscure distinct underlying factors with differential predictive validity; however, no study to date has examined this possibility. In a sample of 105 cannabis users, temporo-spatial Principal Component Analysis was used to decompose cannabis cue modulation of the LPP into its underlying factors. Acute stress was also inducted to allow for identification of specific cannabis LPP factors sensitive to stress. Factor associations with CUD severity were also explored. Eight factors showed significantly increased amplitudes to cannabis images relative to neutral images. These factors spanned early (~372 ms), middle (~824 ms), and late (>1000 ms) windows across frontal, central, and parietal-occipital sites. CUD phenotype individual differences were primarily associated with frontal, middle/late latency factor amplitudes. Acute stress effects were limited to one early central and one late frontal factor. Taken together, results suggest that the cannabis LPP can be decomposed into distinct, temporal-spatial factors with differential responsivity to acute stress and CUD phenotype variability. Future individual difference studies examining drug cue modulation of the LPP should consider (1) frontalcentral poolings in addition to conventional central-parietal sites, and (2) later LPP time windows.

Indexed as

CannabisCuesElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansPrincipal Component Analysisaddictionaddictive behaviorsanalysis/statistical methodscontent/topicsEEGgroups studiedmethodspatient groups

Identifiers

PMID37937737
PMCPMC11008592
OpenAlexW4388491559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.