ArticleDental press journal of orthodontics2023
Assessing the reliability of ChatGPT: a content analysis of self-generated and self-answered questions on clear aligners, TADs and digital imaging.
Article in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Facial Attractiveness and Professional Acceptance Between Real and AI-Generated Orthodontic Treatment Outcome Images.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2026Article
- Patient-Facing AI Chatbot Treatment-Direction Advice in Orthodontic Health Communication: A Scenario-Based Comparison with Expert Consensus.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of generative pre-trained transformers for text- and image-based cephalometric prompts using a novel Artificial Intelligence Based Diagnosis and Treatment Planning Index (AIDTI).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence-driven orthodontic education practices.BMC medical education · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of ChatGPT and Gemini artificial intelligence in patient education on clear aligner therapy.The Angle orthodontist · 2026Article
- Domain-Specific vs. General-Purpose Large Language Models in Orthodontics: A Blinded Comparison of AlimGPT, GPT-4o, Gemini, and Llama.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Perception of AI-generated smile versus real orthodontic treatment outcomes among dentists, students, and laypeople.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating the reliability of artificial intelligence in clinical decisions on early maxillary expansion: a comparative study of eight large language models.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence: Applications and Future Prospects in Dentistry.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Applications and potential of ChatGPT in dentistry: Scoping review of research perspectives.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.European journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontics: a narrative review.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Review
- What artificial intelligence (AI) can tell us about Nasoalveolar Molding (NAM)?BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence chatbots in orthodontic emergency scenarios: ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, Copilot, and Gemini.The Angle orthodontist · 2025Article
- Performance of ChatGPT-4 as an Auxiliary Tool: Evaluation of Accuracy and Repeatability on Orthodontic Radiology Questions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Can AI chatbots accurately provide information on orthodontic risks?The Angle orthodontist · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Reliability of AI-Based Large Language Models in Developing Orthodontic Treatment Plans.Cureus · 2025Article
- Generative Pre-trained Transformer: Trends, Applications, Strengths and Challenges in Dentistry: A Systematic Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence solutions for temporomandibular joint disorders: Contributions and future potential of ChatGPT.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the influence of prompt formulation on the reliability and repeatability of ChatGPT in implant-supported prostheses.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionArtificial Intelligence (AI) is a tool that is already part of our reality, and this is an opportunity to understand how it can be useful in interacting with patients and providing valuable information about orthodontics.
objectiveThis study evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT in providing accurate and quality information to answer questions on Clear aligners, Temporary anchorage devices and Digital imaging in orthodontics.
methodsforty-five questions and answers were generated by the ChatGPT 4.0, and analyzed separately by five orthodontists. The evaluators independently rated the quality of information provided on a Likert scale, in which higher scores indicated greater quality of information (1 = very poor; 2 = poor; 3 = acceptable; 4 = good; 5 = very good). The Kruskal-Wallis H test (p< 0.05) and post-hoc pairwise comparisons with the Bonferroni correction were performed.
resultsFrom the 225 evaluations of the five different evaluators, 11 (4.9%) were considered as very poor, 4 (1.8%) as poor, and 15 (6.7%) as acceptable. The majority were considered as good [34 (15,1%)] and very good [161 (71.6%)]. Regarding evaluators' scores, a slight agreement was perceived, with Fleiss's Kappa equal to 0.004.
conclusionsChatGPT has proven effective in providing quality answers related to clear aligners, temporary anchorage devices, and digital imaging within the context of interest of orthodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.