ReviewRecent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery2025
Optimal Rituximab Monotherapy in Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL): A Case Report and Brief Review.
Review in Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSplenic marginal zone Lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare, chronic B lymphocyte proliferative disease. Generally, SMZL is accompanied by circulating atypical villous lymphocytes, known as SMZL with villous lymphocytes. Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody to CD20; recent but limited studies have confirmed its effectiveness in treating SMZL. Given the low incidence and selection of treatment, statistical comparisons of rituximab monotherapy with other available treatment options with the full range of data from previous clinical studies remain sparse. Here, we report a case of SMZL with villous lymphocytes treated by rituximab monotherapy, which is especially infrequently reported. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old Chinese female was presented to the hospital with complaints of splenomegaly and pain in the spleen area. Immunohistochemistry analysis was positive for IGH, IGK, and IGL clonal rearrangement. Villous lymphocytes were found in peripheral blood and bone marrow, along with further immunotyping results. The case was considered as SMZL with villous lymphocytes. Based on the SMZLSG prognosis assessment, we applied rituximab monotherapy. After eight cycles of rituximab treatment, the patient's condition improved markedly, with blood constituent and size of the spleen returning to normal levels, achieving complete response, with no significant side effect observed. DISCUSSION: The patient provides a typical SMZL with villous lymphocytes case treated with rituximab monotherapy. Currently, the main treatment options include splenectomy and rituximab. After synthesizing a series of current views, we put forward our opinion about the selection of therapy for SMZL patients in order to gain maximum benefits for patients in need of treatment.
conclusionOur analysis found no statistically significant difference between rituximab monotherapy and rituximab combined with chemotherapy, while rituximab treatments resulted in better therapeutic effects than chemotherapy. Rituximab monotherapy has favorable therapeutic effects and minor adverse effects (AEs) in treating SMZL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37937574What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.